10-49454992-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1

The NM_000124.4(ERCC6):​c.*3823T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.103 in 152,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,168 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.10 ( 1168 hom., cov: 32)

Consequence

ERCC6
NM_000124.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.182
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC6 (HGNC:3438): (ERCC excision repair 6, chromatin remodeling factor) This gene encodes a DNA-binding protein that is important in transcription-coupled excision repair. The encoded protein has ATP-stimulated ATPase activity, interacts with several transcription and excision repair proteins, and may promote complex formation at DNA repair sites. Mutations in this gene are associated with Cockayne syndrome type B and cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1. Alternative splicing occurs between a splice site from exon 5 of this gene to the 3' splice site upstream of the open reading frame (ORF) of the adjacent gene, piggyback-derived-3 (GeneID:267004), which activates the alternative polyadenylation site downstream of the piggyback-derived-3 ORF. The resulting transcripts encode a fusion protein that shares sequence with the product of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 10-49454992-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-49454992-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 877983.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.37 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ERCC6NM_000124.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.*3823T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 21/21 ENST00000355832.10
ERCC6NM_001346440.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*3823T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 21/21

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ERCC6ENST00000355832.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.*3823T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 21/211 NM_000124.4 P1Q03468-1
ENST00000423283.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.235-17711A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.103
AC:
15654
AN:
152074
Hom.:
1169
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0779
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.170
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0751
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.384
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.114
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0764
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0640
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.110
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.103
AC:
15668
AN:
152192
Hom.:
1168
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.108
AC XY:
8006
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.170
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0751
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.384
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.103
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.114
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0640
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.112
Alfa
AF:
0.0845
Hom.:
91
Bravo
AF:
0.111
Asia WGS
AF:
0.241
AC:
839
AN:
3472

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Age related macular degeneration 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cockayne syndrome type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
CADD
Benign
2.5
DANN
Benign
0.48

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs73297748; hg19: chr10-50663038; API