10-49655101-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_020549.5(CHAT):​c.1641T>C​(p.His547His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.882 in 1,613,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 630,914 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.83 ( 52514 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.89 ( 578400 hom. )

Consequence

CHAT
NM_020549.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.150

Publications

24 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHAT (HGNC:1912): (choline O-acetyltransferase) This gene encodes an enzyme which catalyzes the biosynthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. This gene product is a characteristic feature of cholinergic neurons, and changes in these neurons may explain some of the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Polymorphisms in this gene have been associated with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Mutations in this gene are associated with congenital myasthenic syndrome associated with episodic apnea. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene, and some of these variants have been shown to encode more than one isoform. [provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
CHAT Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 10-49655101-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-49655101-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 128719.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.15 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.901 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHATNM_020549.5 linkc.1641T>C p.His547His synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 15 ENST00000337653.7 NP_065574.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHATENST00000337653.7 linkc.1641T>C p.His547His synonymous_variant Exon 12 of 15 1 NM_020549.5 ENSP00000337103.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.825
AC:
125481
AN:
152022
Hom.:
52510
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.690
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.834
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.765
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.856
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.795
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.862
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.893
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.902
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.907
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.848
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.844
AC:
212168
AN:
251374
AF XY:
0.854
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.686
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.679
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.858
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.803
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.890
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.907
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.861
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.888
AC:
1297416
AN:
1461742
Hom.:
578400
Cov.:
54
AF XY:
0.888
AC XY:
645965
AN XY:
727188
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.677
AC:
22672
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.686
AC:
30696
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.854
AC:
22319
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.785
AC:
31164
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.866
AC:
74717
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.891
AC:
47554
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.865
AC:
4987
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.909
AC:
1010528
AN:
1111906
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.874
AC:
52779
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8231
16462
24694
32925
41156
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21412
42824
64236
85648
107060
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.825
AC:
125521
AN:
152140
Hom.:
52514
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.824
AC XY:
61278
AN XY:
74368
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.690
AC:
28623
AN:
41468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.765
AC:
11694
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.856
AC:
2971
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.795
AC:
4113
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.862
AC:
4147
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.893
AC:
9466
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.891
AC:
262
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.907
AC:
61706
AN:
68000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.841
AC:
1778
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1020
2040
3061
4081
5101
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
880
1760
2640
3520
4400
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.878
Hom.:
266055
Bravo
AF:
0.807
Asia WGS
AF:
0.804
AC:
2798
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.905
EpiControl
AF:
0.906

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Nov 17, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 19, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial infantile myasthenia Benign:2
Jul 22, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 11, 2016
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
0.97
DANN
Benign
0.40
PhyloP100
-0.15
Mutation Taster
=72/28
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs8178992; hg19: chr10-50863147; COSMIC: COSV60329737; API