10-71617297-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):​c.1038G>A​(p.Pro346Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0118 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 354 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 35 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 319 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -8.05

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
CDH23 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 1D
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 10-71617297-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71617297-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44112.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-8.05 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0689 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkc.1038G>A p.Pro346Pro synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 70 ENST00000224721.12 NP_071407.4 Q9H251-1Q6P152

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkc.1038G>A p.Pro346Pro synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 70 5 NM_022124.6 ENSP00000224721.9 Q9H251-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0110
AC:
1671
AN:
152136
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0455
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0751
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0224
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0665
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00985
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0158
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0181
AC:
4506
AN:
249326
AF XY:
0.0185
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0182
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0473
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0729
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000604
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0185
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0119
AC:
17387
AN:
1461696
Hom.:
319
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0125
AC XY:
9054
AN XY:
727132
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00263
AC:
88
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0169
AC:
758
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0484
AC:
1266
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0803
AC:
3188
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0237
AC:
2045
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000768
AC:
41
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0685
AC:
395
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00776
AC:
8623
AN:
1111866
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0163
AC:
983
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1081
2161
3242
4322
5403
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
360
720
1080
1440
1800
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0110
AC:
1669
AN:
152254
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0119
AC XY:
885
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00137
AC:
57
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0139
AC:
212
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0455
AC:
158
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0751
AC:
389
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0222
AC:
107
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000942
AC:
10
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0680
AC:
20
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00985
AC:
670
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0161
AC:
34
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
85
169
254
338
423
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0128
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.0125
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0370
AC:
129
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0151
EpiControl
AF:
0.0130

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
May 12, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 09, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Pro346Pro in Exon 11A of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.9% (81/8568) of Eu ropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs74608315). -

Nov 07, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Oct 11, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
0.16
DANN
Benign
0.71
PhyloP100
-8.0
PromoterAI
-0.0036
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=85/15
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs74608315; hg19: chr10-73377054; COSMIC: COSV54946284; API