rs74608315
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.1038G>A(p.Pro346=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0118 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 354 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 35 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 319 hom. )
Consequence
CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous
NM_022124.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -8.05
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
?
Variant 10-71617297-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71617297-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44112.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-8.05 with no splicing effect.
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0689 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH23 | NM_022124.6 | c.1038G>A | p.Pro346= | synonymous_variant | 11/70 | ENST00000224721.12 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH23 | ENST00000224721.12 | c.1038G>A | p.Pro346= | synonymous_variant | 11/70 | 5 | NM_022124.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0110 AC: 1671AN: 152136Hom.: 35 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
1671
AN:
152136
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0181 AC: 4506AN: 249326Hom.: 92 AF XY: 0.0185 AC XY: 2508AN XY: 135220
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4506
AN:
249326
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2508
AN XY:
135220
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0119 AC: 17387AN: 1461696Hom.: 319 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0125 AC XY: 9054AN XY: 727132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
17387
AN:
1461696
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
9054
AN XY:
727132
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0110 AC: 1669AN: 152254Hom.: 35 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0119 AC XY: 885AN XY: 74452
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
1669
AN:
152254
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
885
AN XY:
74452
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
129
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 07, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 09, 2013 | Pro346Pro in Exon 11A of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.9% (81/8568) of Eu ropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs74608315). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 12, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 11, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at