Menu
GeneBe

rs74608315

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.1038G>A(p.Pro346=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0118 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 354 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 35 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 319 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -8.05
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 10-71617297-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71617297-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44112.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-8.05 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0689 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1038G>A p.Pro346= synonymous_variant 11/70 ENST00000224721.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.1038G>A p.Pro346= synonymous_variant 11/705 NM_022124.6 P1Q9H251-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0110
AC:
1671
AN:
152136
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0455
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0751
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0224
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0665
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00985
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0158
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0181
AC:
4506
AN:
249326
Hom.:
92
AF XY:
0.0185
AC XY:
2508
AN XY:
135220
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0182
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0473
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0729
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000604
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0185
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0119
AC:
17387
AN:
1461696
Hom.:
319
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0125
AC XY:
9054
AN XY:
727132
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0484
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0803
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0237
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000768
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00776
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0163
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0110
AC:
1669
AN:
152254
Hom.:
35
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0119
AC XY:
885
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0455
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0751
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00985
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0161
Alfa
AF:
0.0128
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.0125
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0370
AC:
129
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0151
EpiControl
AF:
0.0130

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 07, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 09, 2013Pro346Pro in Exon 11A of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.9% (81/8568) of Eu ropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs74608315). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 12, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 11, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
Cadd
Benign
0.16
Dann
Benign
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs74608315; hg19: chr10-73377054; COSMIC: COSV54946284; API