10-71679437-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_022124.6(CDH23):āc.1803C>Gā(p.Val601Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000169 in 1,613,566 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022124.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH23 | NM_022124.6 | c.1803C>G | p.Val601Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 17 of 70 | ENST00000224721.12 | NP_071407.4 | |
CDH23 | NM_001171930.2 | c.1803C>G | p.Val601Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 17 of 32 | NP_001165401.1 | ||
CDH23 | NM_001171931.2 | c.1803C>G | p.Val601Val | synonymous_variant | Exon 17 of 26 | NP_001165402.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152252Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000137 AC: 34AN: 248104Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000126 AC XY: 17AN XY: 134788
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000174 AC: 254AN: 1461314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000169 AC XY: 123AN XY: 726906
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152252Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74386
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
- -
CDH23: BP4, BP7 -
CDH23-related disorder Uncertain:1
- -
Usher syndrome type 1D Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
p.Val601Val in Exon 17 of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 16/60014 European c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs201024982). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at