10-87094428-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The ENST00000277865.5(GLUD1):āc.342T>Cā(p.His114=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00238 in 1,613,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 92 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.013 ( 46 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.0013 ( 46 hom. )
Consequence
GLUD1
ENST00000277865.5 synonymous
ENST00000277865.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.61
Genes affected
GLUD1 (HGNC:4335): (glutamate dehydrogenase 1) This gene encodes glutamate dehydrogenase, which is a mitochondrial matrix enzyme that catalyzes the oxidative deamination of glutamate to alpha-ketoglutarate and ammonia. This enzyme has an important role in regulating amino acid-induced insulin secretion. It is allosterically activated by ADP and inhibited by GTP and ATP. Activating mutations in this gene are a common cause of congenital hyperinsulinism. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. The related glutamate dehydrogenase 2 gene on the human X-chromosome originated from this gene via retrotransposition and encodes a soluble form of glutamate dehydrogenase. Related pseudogenes have been identified on chromosomes 10, 18 and X. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
SHLD2 (HGNC:28773): (shieldin complex subunit 2) Involved in negative regulation of double-strand break repair via homologous recombination; positive regulation of double-strand break repair via nonhomologous end joining; and positive regulation of isotype switching. Located in nucleus and site of double-strand break. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 10-87094428-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-87094428-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129161.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.61 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0128 (1947/152202) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0448 (1862/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0431. There are 46 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 920 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1947 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLUD1 | NM_005271.5 | c.342T>C | p.His114= | synonymous_variant | 1/13 | ENST00000277865.5 | NP_005262.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLUD1 | ENST00000277865.5 | c.342T>C | p.His114= | synonymous_variant | 1/13 | 1 | NM_005271.5 | ENSP00000277865 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0128 AC: 1942AN: 152094Hom.: 46 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1942
AN:
152094
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00317 AC: 795AN: 250994Hom.: 15 AF XY: 0.00225 AC XY: 306AN XY: 135856
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
795
AN:
250994
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
306
AN XY:
135856
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00130 AC: 1893AN: 1461452Hom.: 46 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00109 AC XY: 796AN XY: 727034
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1893
AN:
1461452
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
796
AN XY:
727034
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0128 AC: 1947AN: 152202Hom.: 46 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0124 AC XY: 920AN XY: 74430
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1947
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
920
AN XY:
74430
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 29, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 16, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 08, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at