10-89418391-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000371795.5(IFIT5):c.1192C>T(p.His398Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00193 in 1,614,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000371795.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFIT5 | NM_012420.3 | c.1192C>T | p.His398Tyr | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000371795.5 | NP_036552.1 | |
LOC107984251 | XR_001747541.2 | n.74-2586G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFIT5 | ENST00000371795.5 | c.1192C>T | p.His398Tyr | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_012420.3 | ENSP00000360860 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0100 AC: 1524AN: 152176Hom.: 25 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00264 AC: 664AN: 251432Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00194 AC XY: 264AN XY: 135904
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00109 AC: 1592AN: 1461866Hom.: 16 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000961 AC XY: 699AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0100 AC: 1527AN: 152294Hom.: 25 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00953 AC XY: 710AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at