Menu
GeneBe

11-108251932-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.1703G>T(p.Arg568Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000122 in 1,613,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R568G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.780
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012072533).
BP6
Variant 11-108251932-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108251932-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 140916.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=7, Likely_benign=6, Benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1703G>T p.Arg568Ile missense_variant 11/63 ENST00000675843.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1703G>T p.Arg568Ile missense_variant 11/63 NM_000051.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000219
AC:
55
AN:
251228
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000169
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
135768
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000203
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00357
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000124
AC:
181
AN:
1461552
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000127
AC XY:
92
AN XY:
727074
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00406
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000369
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000298
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.000329
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000147
ExAC
AF:
0.000140
AC:
17
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:4Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 28, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 03, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 11, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Feb 20, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 19, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 16, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 20, 2020- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 21, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 18, 2021Variant summary: ATM c.1703G>T (p.Arg568Ile) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00019 in 276984 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0034 within the Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Ashkenazi Jewish control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Ashkenazi Jewish origin. c.1703G>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Colorectal cancer or prostate cancer (Yurgelun_2016, Paulo_2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants have been reported (ATM c.8934_8935del, p.E2979Afs*9; CHEK2 c.1283C>T, p.Ser428Phe, Yurgelun_2016 and internal data), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Twelve clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (Benign n=1, Likely benign n=4, VUS n=7). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 21, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 17, 2021Observed in individuals with a personal and/or family history of melanoma, breast, ovarian, endometrial, colorectal or prostate cancer (Tung 2015, Decker 2017, Yurgelun 2017, Cock-Rada 2018, Paulo 2018, Pritchard 2018, Yehia 2018); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26878173, 27997549, 28528518, 28135145, 28873162, 29641532, 28779002, 29684080, 28137924, 25186627, 29659569, 31658756) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2016- -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoMar 30, 2021ATM NM_000051.3 exon11 p.Arg568Ile (c.1703G>T): This variant has been reported in the literature in 1 individual with rectal cancer (Yurgelun 2017 PMID:28135145). This variant is present in 0.3% (36/10366) of Ashkenazi Jewish alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/11-108122659-G-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:140916). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools suggest that this variant may not impact the protein. Of note, an additional variant at this same amino acid position (p.Arg568Lys) was identified in a patient with a history of cervix and breast cancer. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Arg568Ile variant was identified in 1 of 170 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) from individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancer (Cock-Rada 2017). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs200381392) as With Uncertain significance allele, ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, GenDx, Invitae) and Clinvitae. The variant was not identified in the COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, or LOVD 3.0 databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 54 of 276984 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Arg568 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
Cadd
Benign
18
Dann
Benign
0.96
Eigen
Benign
-0.30
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.17
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.50
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.85
T;T;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.070
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.12
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.12
.;B;B
Vest4
0.36, 0.46
MVP
0.67
MPC
0.24
ClinPred
0.037
T
GERP RS
2.8
Varity_R
0.097
gMVP
0.27

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200381392; hg19: chr11-108122659; COSMIC: COSV99588781; COSMIC: COSV99588781; API