11-108272729-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.3161C>G​(p.Pro1054Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.022 in 1,613,692 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 492 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 30 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 462 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

6
6
6

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0074827075).
BP6
Variant 11-108272729-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108272729-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 132695.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108272729-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-108272729-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0165 (2517/152258) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0269 (1829/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0259. There are 30 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1134 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 30 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3161C>G p.Pro1054Arg missense_variant 22/63 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3 Q13315A0A024R3C7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.3161C>G p.Pro1054Arg missense_variant 22/63 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606.1 Q13315

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0166
AC:
2521
AN:
152140
Hom.:
30
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0189
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0210
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00435
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00782
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0269
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0230
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0166
AC:
4160
AN:
251228
Hom.:
61
AF XY:
0.0169
AC XY:
2302
AN XY:
135822
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00425
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00503
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00801
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0267
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0232
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0226
AC:
33044
AN:
1461434
Hom.:
462
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0224
AC XY:
16284
AN XY:
727028
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00370
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0198
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00550
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00787
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0266
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0199
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0165
AC:
2517
AN:
152258
Hom.:
30
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0152
AC XY:
1134
AN XY:
74440
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00409
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0188
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0210
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00782
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0269
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0223
Alfa
AF:
0.0218
Hom.:
46
Bravo
AF:
0.0171
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0286
AC:
106
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0330
AC:
127
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00591
AC:
26
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0228
AC:
196
ExAC
AF:
0.0169
AC:
2046
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00635
AC:
22
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0267
EpiControl
AF:
0.0280

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJan 19, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsJan 25, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 10, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 10, 2020- -
not specified Benign:3Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 09, 2015- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30957677, 31382929, 26122175, 18502988, 24728327, 27599564, 27153395, 10464642, 17502119, 22529920, 21833744, 19431188, 23585524, 15101044, 11996792, 20826828, 23125224) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 17, 2023- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.May 13, 2024This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Pro1054Arg variant was identified in both proband chromosomes (frequency not specified) from Swiss, Brazilian and European individuals or families with (early onset or sporadic) breast cancers, and in control chromosomes (frequency not specified) from healthy individuals (Mangone 2015, Milne 2009, Maillet 2002), increasing the likelihood this variant is not associated with breast cancer. Genotyping of 5 polymorphisms (with MAF 0.9-2.6%) including this variant in a large case control study, showed that the 5 missense polymorphisms were associated with a small increased risk of breast cancer (Fletecher 2010). The variant was confirmed to be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer in a cohort of prostate cancer cases, being identified in 50 of 522 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.096), and 22 of 920 healthy controls were found to be carriers (1 homozygous, frequency: 0.024, Meyer 2007). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1800057) as “With Benign allele”, Clinvitae database (classified as benign), ClinVar database (classification benign by Ambry Genetics, Emory Genetics, Color Genomics Inc, Prevention Genetics, Invitae and not classified by ITMI), and in COSMIC (in a squamous cell carcinoma, and lymphoid neoplasm-Burkitt lymphoma). The variant was also identified in LOVD 3.0 (2x) databases, but not in the ATM-LOVD database. The variant was identified in control databases in 4511 of 277018 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.016284 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: European (Non-Finnish) in 3306 of 126596 chromosomes (freq: 0.026), Ashkenazi Jewish in 224 of 10148 chromosomes (freq: 0.022), Other in 122 of 6458 chromosomes (freq: 0.019), Latino in 390 of 34412 chromosomes (freq: 0.011). The p.Pro1054 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs 8 nucleotides from the intron-exon junction and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.51
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.26
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.13
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.53
.;D;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.75
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.71
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.86
D;D;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0075
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.18
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.9
.;M;M
PrimateAI
Benign
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.5
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.39
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;D
Vest4
0.95, 0.92
MPC
0.59
ClinPred
0.022
T
GERP RS
5.6
Varity_R
0.47
gMVP
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800057; hg19: chr11-108143456; COSMIC: COSV53728348; COSMIC: COSV53728348; API