11-108281109-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_000051.4(ATM):ā€‹c.3517T>Cā€‹(p.Leu1173=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000139 in 1,614,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00072 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000079 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.17
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 11-108281109-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108281109-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136442.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108281109-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.17 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000716 (109/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00248 (103/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00209. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 57 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3517T>C p.Leu1173= synonymous_variant 24/63 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.3517T>C p.Leu1173= synonymous_variant 24/63 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000716
AC:
109
AN:
152200
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000155
AC:
39
AN:
251388
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000118
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
135866
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000787
AC:
115
AN:
1461742
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000743
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
727174
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00224
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000162
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000215
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000716
AC:
109
AN:
152318
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000765
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000507
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000869
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000867
AC:
3
AN:
3474
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 29, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 03, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 14, 2018Variant summary: ATM c.3517T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00022 in 277144 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0023 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3517T>C in individuals affected with Breast Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA1 c.1386delG), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoSep 02, 2015- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMay 01, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 01, 2019- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 22, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 29, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 28, 2021- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.May 14, 2024This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSep 09, 2019- -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Leu1173= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs141460670) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx and Invitae; likely benign by Ambry Genetics, University of Chicago, Color Genomics and EGL Genetic Diagnostics), LOVD 3.0 (classified as likely benign by VKGL data sharing initiative).The variant was identified in control databases in 60 of 277144 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 56 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Other in 1 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 2 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), European Non-Finnish in 1 of 126642 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Leu1173= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site and the nucleotide is not conserved in mammals. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
9.8
DANN
Benign
0.77
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141460670; hg19: chr11-108151836; API