chr11-108281109-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1
The NM_000051.4(ATM):āc.3517T>Cā(p.Leu1173=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000139 in 1,614,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00072 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.000079 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
ATM
NM_000051.4 synonymous
NM_000051.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.17
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 11-108281109-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108281109-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136442.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108281109-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.17 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000716 (109/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00248 (103/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00209. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 57 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.3517T>C | p.Leu1173= | synonymous_variant | 24/63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.3517T>C | p.Leu1173= | synonymous_variant | 24/63 | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000716 AC: 109AN: 152200Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
109
AN:
152200
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000155 AC: 39AN: 251388Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000118 AC XY: 16AN XY: 135866
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
39
AN:
251388
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
135866
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000787 AC: 115AN: 1461742Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000743 AC XY: 54AN XY: 727174
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
115
AN:
1461742
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
727174
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000716 AC: 109AN: 152318Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000765 AC XY: 57AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
109
AN:
152318
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3474
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 29, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 03, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 14, 2018 | Variant summary: ATM c.3517T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00022 in 277144 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0023 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3517T>C in individuals affected with Breast Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA1 c.1386delG), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 02, 2015 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 01, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 01, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 22, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 29, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 28, 2021 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | May 14, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Sep 09, 2019 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM p.Leu1173= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs141460670) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx and Invitae; likely benign by Ambry Genetics, University of Chicago, Color Genomics and EGL Genetic Diagnostics), LOVD 3.0 (classified as likely benign by VKGL data sharing initiative).The variant was identified in control databases in 60 of 277144 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 56 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Other in 1 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 2 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), European Non-Finnish in 1 of 126642 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Leu1173= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site and the nucleotide is not conserved in mammals. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at