Menu
GeneBe

11-111911560-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001289808.2(CRYAB):c.165G>A(p.Leu55=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0185 in 1,612,794 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 349 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 23 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.019 ( 326 hom. )

Consequence

CRYAB
NM_001289808.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.166
Variant links:
Genes affected
CRYAB (HGNC:2389): (crystallin alpha B) Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families. Alpha crystallins are composed of two gene products: alpha-A and alpha-B, for acidic and basic, respectively. Alpha crystallins can be induced by heat shock and are members of the small heat shock protein (HSP20) family. They act as molecular chaperones although they do not renature proteins and release them in the fashion of a true chaperone; instead they hold them in large soluble aggregates. These heterogeneous aggregates consist of 30-40 subunits; the alpha-A and alpha-B subunits have a 3:1 ratio, respectively. Two additional functions of alpha crystallins are an autokinase activity and participation in the intracellular architecture. The encoded protein has been identified as a moonlighting protein based on its ability to perform mechanistically distinct functions. Alpha-A and alpha-B gene products are differentially expressed; alpha-A is preferentially restricted to the lens and alpha-B is expressed widely in many tissues and organs. Elevated expression of alpha-B crystallin occurs in many neurological diseases; a missense mutation cosegregated in a family with a desmin-related myopathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 11-111911560-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-111911560-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44233.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-111911560-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-111911560-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.166 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0132 (2014/152176) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0239 (115/4812). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0204. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 904 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 2015 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CRYABNM_001289808.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.165G>A p.Leu55= synonymous_variant 1/3 ENST00000650687.2
CRYABNM_001289807.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.165G>A p.Leu55= synonymous_variant 2/4
CRYABNM_001368245.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.165G>A p.Leu55= synonymous_variant 2/4
CRYABNM_001885.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.165G>A p.Leu55= synonymous_variant 2/4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CRYABENST00000650687.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.165G>A p.Leu55= synonymous_variant 1/3 NM_001289808.2 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0133
AC:
2015
AN:
152058
Hom.:
23
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00377
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00885
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0237
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0110
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0154
AC:
3821
AN:
248196
Hom.:
55
AF XY:
0.0166
AC XY:
2222
AN XY:
134142
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00283
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00458
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000164
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0264
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0151
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0191
AC:
27861
AN:
1460618
Hom.:
326
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0191
AC XY:
13867
AN XY:
726454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00525
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00591
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0210
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0156
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0132
AC:
2014
AN:
152176
Hom.:
23
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0121
AC XY:
904
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00376
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00884
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0239
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0205
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0109
Alfa
AF:
0.0169
Hom.:
15
Bravo
AF:
0.0119
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00837
AC:
30
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 10, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 02, 2011Leu55Leu in exon 1 of CRYAB: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid, is not located within the splic e consensus sequence, and has been identified in 1.5% (166/10758) of chromosomes from a broad, though clinically and ethnically unspecified population (dbSNP rs 2228387). Leu55Leu in exon 1 of CRYAB (rs2228387; allele frequency = 1.5%, 166/ 10758) -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 25, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 07, 2018- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1II Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Myofibrillar Myopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Fatal infantile hypertonic myofibrillar myopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 15, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cataract 16 multiple types Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
Cadd
Benign
9.4
Dann
Benign
0.85

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2228387; hg19: chr11-111782284; API