11-116835880-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000039.3(APOA1):āc.732C>Gā(p.Pro244=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000687 in 1,613,250 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P244P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000039.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOA1 | NM_000039.3 | c.732C>G | p.Pro244= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000236850.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOA1 | ENST00000236850.5 | c.732C>G | p.Pro244= | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_000039.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00337 AC: 513AN: 152252Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000953 AC: 238AN: 249834Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000737 AC XY: 100AN XY: 135624
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000406 AC: 593AN: 1460880Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000377 AC XY: 274AN XY: 726768
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00339 AC: 516AN: 152370Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00336 AC XY: 250AN XY: 74510
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 14, 2018 | Variant summary: APOA1 c.732C>G alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Three predict the variant creates a cryptic 5' donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 275838 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.011 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 440-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in APOA1 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. A publication cites the variant in a cohort from the Copenhagen City Heart Study (Haase_2012), but with limitied information. A ClinVar submission from another clinical diagnostic laboratory (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as "likely benign." Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 27, 2022 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 15, 2021 | - - |
Familial visceral amyloidosis, Ostertag type Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Hypoalphalipoproteinemia, primary, 2, intermediate Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Hypoalphalipoproteinemia, primary, 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 21, 2021 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hypoalphalipoproteinemia, primary, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at