11-119339297-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_031433.4(MFRP):​c.*1662C>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00215 in 1,603,536 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 100 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 95 hom. )

Consequence

MFRP
NM_031433.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0410

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MFRP (HGNC:18121): (membrane frizzled-related protein) This gene encodes a member of the frizzled-related protein family. The encoded protein plays an important role in eye development and mutations in this gene have been associated with nanophthalmos, posterior microphthalmia, retinitis pigmentosa, foveoschisis, and optic disc drusen. The protein is encoded by a bicistronic transcript which also encodes C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 5 (C1QTNF5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2013]
C1QTNF5 (HGNC:14344): (C1q and TNF related 5) This gene encodes a member of a family of proteins that function as components of basement membranes and may play a role in cell adhesion. Mutations in this gene have been associated with late-onset retinal degeneration. The protein may be encoded by either a bicistronic transcript including sequence from the upstream membrane frizzled-related protein gene (MFRP), or by a monocistronic transcript expressed from an internal promoter. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2013]
C1QTNF5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • late-onset retinal degeneration
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 11-119339297-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-119339297-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 302923.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00139 (212/152284) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0423 (204/4818). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0376. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 162 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MFRPNM_031433.4 linkc.*1662C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 15 ENST00000619721.6 NP_113621.1 Q9BY79-1
C1QTNF5NM_001278431.2 linkc.*34C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 3 ENST00000528368.3 NP_001265360.1 Q9BXJ0A0A024R3F8
C1QTNF5NM_015645.5 linkc.*34C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 15 NP_056460.1 Q9BXJ0A0A024R3F8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MFRPENST00000619721.6 linkc.*1662C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 15 1 NM_031433.4 ENSP00000481824.1 Q9BY79-1
C1QTNF5ENST00000528368.3 linkc.*34C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 3 1 NM_001278431.2 ENSP00000431140.1 Q9BXJ0
C1QTNF5ENST00000530681.2 linkc.*34C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 2 1 ENSP00000456533.2 Q9BXJ0
C1QTNF5ENST00000525657.2 linkn.*73C>G downstream_gene_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00139
AC:
211
AN:
152166
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0421
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00484
AC:
1165
AN:
240920
AF XY:
0.00645
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000620
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00253
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00223
AC:
3232
AN:
1451252
Hom.:
95
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00318
AC XY:
2290
AN XY:
720974
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000902
AC:
3
AN:
33272
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
43976
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25364
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000505
AC:
2
AN:
39572
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0358
AC:
3041
AN:
84872
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52736
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00210
AC:
12
AN:
5712
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000723
AC:
8
AN:
1105854
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00277
AC:
166
AN:
59894
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
162
325
487
650
812
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
48
96
144
192
240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00139
AC:
212
AN:
152284
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00218
AC XY:
162
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000962
AC:
4
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000387
AC:
2
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0423
AC:
204
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9
19
28
38
47
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000214
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000242
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0200
AC:
69
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinal degeneration Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Isolated microphthalmia 5 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Late-onset retinal degeneration Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
5.5
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
0.041
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200181343; hg19: chr11-119210007; API