11-122855722-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000227348.9(CRTAM):āc.518A>Gā(p.Asp173Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00266 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 126 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000227348.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTAM | NM_019604.4 | c.518A>G | p.Asp173Gly | missense_variant | 5/10 | ENST00000227348.9 | NP_062550.2 | |
CRTAM | XM_011542900.3 | c.365A>G | p.Asp122Gly | missense_variant | 4/9 | XP_011541202.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTAM | ENST00000227348.9 | c.518A>G | p.Asp173Gly | missense_variant | 5/10 | 1 | NM_019604.4 | ENSP00000227348 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0137 AC: 2090AN: 152168Hom.: 59 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00380 AC: 954AN: 251274Hom.: 29 AF XY: 0.00267 AC XY: 363AN XY: 135798
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00150 AC: 2198AN: 1461778Hom.: 67 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00127 AC XY: 924AN XY: 727188
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0137 AC: 2093AN: 152286Hom.: 59 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0134 AC XY: 997AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 08, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at