11-122855722-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_019604.4(CRTAM):āc.518A>Gā(p.Asp173Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00266 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 126 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019604.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTAM | NM_019604.4 | c.518A>G | p.Asp173Gly | missense_variant | 5/10 | ENST00000227348.9 | NP_062550.2 | |
CRTAM | XM_011542900.3 | c.365A>G | p.Asp122Gly | missense_variant | 4/9 | XP_011541202.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTAM | ENST00000227348.9 | c.518A>G | p.Asp173Gly | missense_variant | 5/10 | 1 | NM_019604.4 | ENSP00000227348 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0137 AC: 2090AN: 152168Hom.: 59 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00380 AC: 954AN: 251274Hom.: 29 AF XY: 0.00267 AC XY: 363AN XY: 135798
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00150 AC: 2198AN: 1461778Hom.: 67 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00127 AC XY: 924AN XY: 727188
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0137 AC: 2093AN: 152286Hom.: 59 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0134 AC XY: 997AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 08, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at