11-17387686-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_000525.4(KCNJ11):c.406C>A(p.Arg136Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R136H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000525.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNJ11 | NM_000525.4 | c.406C>A | p.Arg136Ser | missense_variant | 1/1 | ENST00000339994.5 | |
KCNJ11 | NM_001166290.2 | c.145C>A | p.Arg49Ser | missense_variant | 2/2 | ||
KCNJ11 | NM_001377296.1 | c.145C>A | p.Arg49Ser | missense_variant | 3/3 | ||
KCNJ11 | NM_001377297.1 | c.145C>A | p.Arg49Ser | missense_variant | 2/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNJ11 | ENST00000339994.5 | c.406C>A | p.Arg136Ser | missense_variant | 1/1 | NM_000525.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 63
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Type 2 diabetes mellitus Pathogenic:1
Likely risk allele, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic | - | rs766891274 variant of in KCNJ11 gene can cause decreased production and secretion of insulin. This can lead to MODY which is responsive to oral sulfonylureas. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 03, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at