Menu
GeneBe

11-2847958-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000218.3(KCNQ1):c.1986C>T(p.Tyr662=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.223 in 1,564,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 43,837 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2983 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.23 ( 40854 hom. )

Consequence

KCNQ1
NM_000218.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.57
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNQ1 (HGNC:6294): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 1) This gene encodes a voltage-gated potassium channel required for repolarization phase of the cardiac action potential. This protein can form heteromultimers with two other potassium channel proteins, KCNE1 and KCNE3. Mutations in this gene are associated with hereditary long QT syndrome 1 (also known as Romano-Ward syndrome), Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome, and familial atrial fibrillation. This gene exhibits tissue-specific imprinting, with preferential expression from the maternal allele in some tissues, and biallelic expression in others. This gene is located in a region of chromosome 11 amongst other imprinted genes that are associated with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), and itself has been shown to be disrupted by chromosomal rearrangements in patients with BWS. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]
KCNQ1-AS1 (HGNC:42790): (KCNQ1 antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 11-2847958-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-2847958-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 42489.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-2847958-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.57 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.254 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KCNQ1NM_000218.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1986C>T p.Tyr662= synonymous_variant 16/16 ENST00000155840.12
KCNQ1-AS1NR_130721.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.778-7516G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KCNQ1ENST00000155840.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.1986C>T p.Tyr662= synonymous_variant 16/161 NM_000218.3 P1P51787-1
KCNQ1-AS1ENST00000440887.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.777-7516G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.170
AC:
25916
AN:
152034
Hom.:
2984
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0487
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.317
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.132
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.176
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0851
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.258
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.123
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.257
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.159
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.172
AC:
30776
AN:
178672
Hom.:
3380
AF XY:
0.174
AC XY:
16631
AN XY:
95804
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0415
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0934
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.180
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000505
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0937
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.271
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.255
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.188
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.229
AC:
323694
AN:
1412218
Hom.:
40854
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.227
AC XY:
157968
AN XY:
697170
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0410
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0994
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.177
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000456
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0965
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.272
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.259
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.192
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.170
AC:
25909
AN:
152152
Hom.:
2983
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.168
AC XY:
12493
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0486
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.176
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0852
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.258
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.257
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.157
Alfa
AF:
0.185
Hom.:
827
Bravo
AF:
0.154
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0380
AC:
133
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 10, 2011This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Tyr662Tyr in Exon 16 of KCNQ1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 23.6% (1636/6932) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequen cing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs11601907). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-multiple AR variants in same gene - keep for nowAllele frequency is common in at least one population database (frequency: 46.46% in ExAC) based on the frequency threshold of 0.868% for this gene.Variant was observed in a homozygous state in population databases more than expected for disease.11 reputable source/s reports the variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.A synonymous variant not located in a splice region. -
Long QT syndrome 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory - Cardiogenetics, CHU de NantesAug 01, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Long QT syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCohesion PhenomicsSep 23, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Atrial fibrillation, familial, 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Short QT syndrome type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Congenital long QT syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 19, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 16, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
Cadd
Benign
1.5
Dann
Benign
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11601907; hg19: chr11-2869188; COSMIC: COSV50126746; API