11-32428521-G-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM5BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.760C>A(p.Pro254Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000052 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P254S) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.42

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM5

Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr11-32428521-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20790094).

BP6

Variant 11-32428521-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32428521-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 864601.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 80 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6 link	c.760C>A	p.Pro254Thr	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 10	ENST00000452863.10	NP_077744.4	P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10 link	c.760C>A	p.Pro254Thr	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 10	1	NM_024426.6	ENSP00000415516.5		P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152204

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000772

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000279

AC:

AN:

251132

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000294

AC XY:

AN XY:

135842

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000326

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000547

AC:

AN:

1461804

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000523

AC XY:

AN XY:

727212

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00199

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152322

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74482

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000774

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00000464

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000113

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Uncertain:1

Jan 14, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 249 of the WT1 protein (p.Pro249Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs2234584, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of WT1-related conditions (PMID: 32604935). This variant is also known as c.760C>A. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 864601). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt WT1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Sep 11, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.0054

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.050

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

Eigen

Benign

-0.057

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.18

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

D;.;D;.;.;.;.;.

M_CAP

Benign

0.024

MetaRNN

Benign

0.21

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.59

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.55

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.6

N;N;N;N;N;.;.;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.43

Sift

Benign

0.30

T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.

Polyphen

0.0010

B;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.86

MVP

0.73

ClinPred

0.49

GERP RS

5.6

gMVP

0.29

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over