Menu
GeneBe

rs2234584

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.760C>T(p.Pro254Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000513 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P254L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00040 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00052 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense

Scores

1
5
10

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:11O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.056760073).
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 61 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.760C>T p.Pro254Ser missense_variant 2/10 ENST00000452863.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.760C>T p.Pro254Ser missense_variant 2/101 NM_024426.6 P19544-7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000401
AC:
61
AN:
152204
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000981
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000573
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000390
AC:
98
AN:
251132
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000412
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
135842
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000678
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000525
AC:
767
AN:
1461804
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000509
AC XY:
370
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000119
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000627
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000530
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000400
AC:
61
AN:
152322
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000456
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000573
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000473
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000325
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000582
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000379
AC:
46
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:11Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchGharavi Laboratory, Columbia UniversitySep 16, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 28, 2023Identified in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), Wilms tumor, or variations of sex characteristics, but also in individuals without any WT1-related disorder (Schumacher et al., 1997; Kohler et al., 2004; Little et al., 2004; Kohler et al., 2011; Bodian et al., 2014; Lehnhardt et al., 2015; He et al., 2016; Sen et al., 2017); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Also known as c.541C>T (p.P181S); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 26934580, 21508141, 26489027, 26332594, 9108089, 15483024, 15191353, 25818337, 8019557, 28873162, 27288520, 27930734, 26343386, 25451826, 28780565, 19221039, 8486616) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenDec 01, 2023WT1: PM5:Supporting, PS4:Supporting, BP4, BS1 -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoOct 01, 2020DNA sequence analysis of the WT1 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.760C>T, in exon 2 that results in an amino acid change, p.Pro254Ser. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.063% in the European sub-population (dbSNP rs2234584). The p.Pro254Ser change has been identified in one individual with Wilm's tumor and another individual with 46,XY disorder of sexual development (PMIDs: 9108089, 21508141). The p.Pro254Ser change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the WT1 protein that is known to be functional. The p.Pro254Ser substitution appears to be benign using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Pro254Ser change remains unknown at this time. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 20, 2023Variant summary: WT1 c.760C>T (p.Pro254Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 251132 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 41.62 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in WT1 causing Wilms Tumor, Type 1 phenotype (9.4e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.760C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Wilms Tumor, amongts other phenotypes (ie: Schumacher_1997, etc). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Wilms Tumor, Type 1. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Ten submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments: five submitted the variant as VUS while five submitted the variant as likely benign/benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 25, 2017Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Classified this year. The variant has been reported in 4 papers: 1 patient with wilms tumor but no second somatic mutation, 1 healthy indvidual, 1 with abnormal sex development, and one with ureteropelvic junction obstruction in which it was predicted to be VUS. It has been seen in 40/66282 alleles in ExAC (0.06%) (too high for disease/gene contribution?). -
Microscopic hematuria Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUNC Molecular Genetics Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillFeb 15, 2022- -
11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 10, 2024- -
Nephroblastoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 16, 2022- -
Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
WT1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesOct 15, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 05, 2021- -
Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.057
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.050
Cadd
Benign
23
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen
Benign
-0.056
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.17
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;.;D;.;.;.;.;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.026
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.057
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.51
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N;N;N;N;.;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Benign
0.14
T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.80
T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0040
B;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.82
MVP
0.71
ClinPred
0.056
T
GERP RS
5.6
gMVP
0.26

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2234584; hg19: chr11-32450067; COSMIC: COSV60071168; API