rs2234584
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.760C>T(p.Pro254Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000513 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P254L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024426.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | NM_024426.6 | c.760C>T | p.Pro254Ser | missense_variant | 2/10 | ENST00000452863.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | ENST00000452863.10 | c.760C>T | p.Pro254Ser | missense_variant | 2/10 | 1 | NM_024426.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000401 AC: 61AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000390 AC: 98AN: 251132Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000412 AC XY: 56AN XY: 135842
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000525 AC: 767AN: 1461804Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000509 AC XY: 370AN XY: 727212
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000400 AC: 61AN: 152322Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000456 AC XY: 34AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Gharavi Laboratory, Columbia University | Sep 16, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 28, 2023 | Identified in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), Wilms tumor, or variations of sex characteristics, but also in individuals without any WT1-related disorder (Schumacher et al., 1997; Kohler et al., 2004; Little et al., 2004; Kohler et al., 2011; Bodian et al., 2014; Lehnhardt et al., 2015; He et al., 2016; Sen et al., 2017); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Also known as c.541C>T (p.P181S); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 26934580, 21508141, 26489027, 26332594, 9108089, 15483024, 15191353, 25818337, 8019557, 28873162, 27288520, 27930734, 26343386, 25451826, 28780565, 19221039, 8486616) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2023 | WT1: PM5:Supporting, PS4:Supporting, BP4, BS1 - |
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 01, 2020 | DNA sequence analysis of the WT1 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.760C>T, in exon 2 that results in an amino acid change, p.Pro254Ser. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.063% in the European sub-population (dbSNP rs2234584). The p.Pro254Ser change has been identified in one individual with Wilm's tumor and another individual with 46,XY disorder of sexual development (PMIDs: 9108089, 21508141). The p.Pro254Ser change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the WT1 protein that is known to be functional. The p.Pro254Ser substitution appears to be benign using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Pro254Ser change remains unknown at this time. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 20, 2023 | Variant summary: WT1 c.760C>T (p.Pro254Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 251132 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 41.62 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in WT1 causing Wilms Tumor, Type 1 phenotype (9.4e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.760C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Wilms Tumor, amongts other phenotypes (ie: Schumacher_1997, etc). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Wilms Tumor, Type 1. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Ten submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments: five submitted the variant as VUS while five submitted the variant as likely benign/benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 25, 2017 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Classified this year. The variant has been reported in 4 papers: 1 patient with wilms tumor but no second somatic mutation, 1 healthy indvidual, 1 with abnormal sex development, and one with ureteropelvic junction obstruction in which it was predicted to be VUS. It has been seen in 40/66282 alleles in ExAC (0.06%) (too high for disease/gene contribution?). - |
Microscopic hematuria Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | UNC Molecular Genetics Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Feb 15, 2022 | - - |
11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 10, 2024 | - - |
Nephroblastoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 16, 2022 | - - |
Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
WT1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 15, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 05, 2021 | - - |
Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at