rs2234584

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.760C>T(p.Pro254Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000513 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P254T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00040 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00052 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:13O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.42

Publications

21 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Denys-Drash syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
Wilms tumor 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Frasier syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.056760073).

BP6

Variant 11-32428521-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32428521-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 135453.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 61 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024426.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6	MANE Select	c.760C>T	p.Pro254Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 10	NP_077744.4
WT1	NM_024424.5		c.760C>T	p.Pro254Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 10	NP_077742.3	H0Y7K5
WT1	NM_001407044.1		c.760C>T	p.Pro254Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 10	NP_001393973.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.760C>T	p.Pro254Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 10	ENSP00000415516.5	P19544-7
WT1	ENST00000639563.4	TSL:1	c.760C>T	p.Pro254Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 9	ENSP00000492269.3	P19544-8
WT1	ENST00000332351.9	TSL:1	c.760C>T	p.Pro254Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 9	ENSP00000331327.5	J3KNN9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000401

AC:

AN:

152204

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000981

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000377

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000573

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000390

AC:

AN:

251132

AF XY:

0.000412

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000418

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000678

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000490

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000525

AC:

767

AN:

1461804

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000509

AC XY:

370

AN XY:

727212

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000119

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000224

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000383

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000431

AC:

AN:

53334

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000627

AC:

697

AN:

1112010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000530

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

113

170

226

283

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000400

AC:

AN:

152322

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000456

AC XY:

AN XY:

74482

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000722

AC:

AN:

41576

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000980

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5168

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000377

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000573

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000486

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000325

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000809

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000778

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000582

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000379

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000818

EpiControl

AF:

0.000356

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (5)

not specified (4)

Wilms tumor 1 (2)

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 (1)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome (1)

Inborn genetic diseases (1)

Meacham syndrome (1)

Microscopic hematuria (1)

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 (1)

WT1-related disorder (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.057

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.050

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

Eigen

Benign

-0.056

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.17

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

M_CAP

Benign

0.026

MetaRNN

Benign

0.057

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.51

PhyloP100

6.4

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.51

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.6

REVEL

Uncertain

0.42

Sift

Benign

0.14

Sift4G

Benign

0.80

Polyphen

0.0040

Vest4

0.82

MVP

0.71

ClinPred

0.056

GERP RS

5.6

gMVP

0.26

Mutation Taster

=77/23

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over