11-32435238-C-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.123G>C(p.Pro41Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00293 in 1,535,690 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 1 hom., cov: 30)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.455

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).

BP6

Variant 11-32435238-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32435238-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 193453.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-32435238-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.455 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0019 (289/152186) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00338 (230/67972). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00303. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 105 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 289 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6 link	c.123G>C	p.Pro41Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 10	ENST00000452863.10	NP_077744.4	P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10 link	c.123G>C	p.Pro41Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 10	1	NM_024426.6	ENSP00000415516.5		P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00190

AC:

289

AN:

152078

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000604

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000982

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00338

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00220

AC:

292

AN:

132698

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00233

AC XY:

169

AN XY:

72646

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000313

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000764

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00112

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00358

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000181

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00344

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00173

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00304

AC:

4212

AN:

1383504

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00310

AC XY:

2113

AN XY:

682680

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000412

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000912

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000796

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00349

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000328

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00339

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00281

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00190

AC:

289

AN:

152186

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00141

AC XY:

105

AN XY:

74394

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000602

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000980

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00338

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00332

Alfa

AF:

0.00144

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00198

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:16

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:6

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 11, 2022

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28873162) -

Sep 13, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

WT1: BP4, BP7 -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Sep 01, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 06, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Wilms tumor 1

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 20, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Aug 21, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Meacham syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Jul 15, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.75

CADD

Benign

5.0

DANN

Benign

0.66

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over