11-4133621-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_001033.5(RRM1):c.1964T>C(p.Met655Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000865 in 1,612,196 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001033.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RRM1 | NM_001033.5 | c.1964T>C | p.Met655Thr | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 19 | ENST00000300738.10 | NP_001024.1 | |
RRM1 | NM_001318064.1 | c.1673T>C | p.Met558Thr | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 18 | NP_001304993.1 | ||
RRM1 | NM_001330193.1 | c.1298T>C | p.Met433Thr | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 13 | NP_001317122.1 | ||
RRM1 | NM_001318065.1 | c.950T>C | p.Met317Thr | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 13 | NP_001304994.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000539 AC: 82AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000420 AC: 105AN: 250030Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000400 AC XY: 54AN XY: 135138
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000899 AC: 1313AN: 1459894Hom.: 1 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.000858 AC XY: 623AN XY: 726294
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000538 AC: 82AN: 152302Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000497 AC XY: 37AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.1964T>C (p.M655T) alteration is located in exon 17 (coding exon 17) of the RRM1 gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1964, causing the methionine (M) at amino acid position 655 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at