11-47660210-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_024783.4(AGBL2):c.2672C>T(p.Ala891Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000146 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024783.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGBL2 | NM_024783.4 | c.2672C>T | p.Ala891Val | missense_variant | 19/19 | ENST00000525123.6 | NP_079059.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGBL2 | ENST00000525123.6 | c.2672C>T | p.Ala891Val | missense_variant | 19/19 | 1 | NM_024783.4 | ENSP00000435582.1 | ||
AGBL2 | ENST00000528609.5 | n.*799C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/9 | 1 | ENSP00000431912.1 | ||||
AGBL2 | ENST00000528609.5 | n.*799C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | 1 | ENSP00000431912.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000637 AC: 97AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000207 AC: 52AN: 251220Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000140 AC XY: 19AN XY: 135776
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000923 AC: 135AN: 1461836Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000770 AC XY: 56AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000657 AC: 100AN: 152286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000618 AC XY: 46AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at