11-62613611-TGGGGGGG-TGGGGGGGG

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP6BS2

The NM_000327.4(ROM1):​c.339dupG​(p.Leu114AlafsTer18) variant causes a frameshift change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00072 in 1,576,808 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L114L) has been classified as Likely benign. Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00082 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00071 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

ROM1
NM_000327.4 frameshift

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:3U:4B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.35

Publications

14 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ROM1 (HGNC:10254): (retinal outer segment membrane protein 1) This gene is a member of a photoreceptor-specific gene family and encodes an integral membrane protein found in the photoreceptor disk rim of the eye. This protein can form homodimers or can heterodimerize with another photoreceptor, retinal degeneration slow (RDS). It is essential for disk morphogenesis, and may also function as an adhesion molecule involved in the stabilization and compaction of outer segment disks or in the maintenance of the curvature of the rim. Certain defects in this gene have been associated with the degenerative eye disease retinitis pigmentosa. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ROM1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinitis pigmentosa 7
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 11-62613611-T-TG is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-62613611-T-TG is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 12998.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 124 Unknown,AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ROM1NM_000327.4 linkc.339dupG p.Leu114AlafsTer18 frameshift_variant Exon 1 of 3 ENST00000278833.4 NP_000318.2 Q03395

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ROM1ENST00000278833.4 linkc.339dupG p.Leu114AlafsTer18 frameshift_variant Exon 1 of 3 1 NM_000327.4 ENSP00000278833.3 Q03395
ROM1ENST00000525947.1 linkc.-194dupG 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 3 3 ENSP00000432983.1 E9PMR7
ROM1ENST00000534093.5 linkc.-38-638dupG intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 2 ENSP00000432151.1 E9PS24
ROM1ENST00000525801.1 linkc.-38-638dupG intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 3 ENSP00000433566.1 E9PKF5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000843
AC:
127
AN:
150732
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00120
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000396
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00467
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000474
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00140
AC:
300
AN:
214556
AF XY:
0.00115
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00205
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000348
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00520
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000611
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000559
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000709
AC:
1011
AN:
1425960
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
77
AF XY:
0.000743
AC XY:
527
AN XY:
709354
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00226
AC:
74
AN:
32744
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000321
AC:
14
AN:
43600
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00121
AC:
31
AN:
25660
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00301
AC:
117
AN:
38892
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
91
AN:
84972
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00380
AC:
189
AN:
49752
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
6
AN:
5626
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000395
AC:
429
AN:
1085648
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00102
AC:
60
AN:
59066
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.390
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
54
108
163
217
271
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000822
AC:
124
AN:
150848
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000801
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
73668
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
49
AN:
41100
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000396
AC:
6
AN:
15154
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00116
AC:
4
AN:
3458
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00409
AC:
21
AN:
5130
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00212
AC:
10
AN:
4718
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10470
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000474
AC:
32
AN:
67550
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000968
AC:
2
AN:
2066
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
12
18
24
30
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00152
Hom.:
0

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Uncertain:4Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis pigmentosa Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
-
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University
Significance:Pathogenic
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Aug 19, 2019
Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. The available evidence on this variant's pathogenicity is insufficient or conflicting. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: PP5. -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 21, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1Benign:1
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Jan 01, 2023
Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa 7, digenic Pathogenic:1
Jun 10, 1994
OMIM
Significance:Pathogenic
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

ROM1-related disorder Pathogenic:1
May 24, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely pathogenic
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The ROM1 c.339dupG variant is predicted to result in a frameshift and premature protein termination (p.Leu114Alafs*18). This variant, in the heterozygous state, along with a PRPH2 c.554T>C (p.Leu185Pro) variant, has been reported to be causative for digenic retinitis pigmentosa (Sullivan. 2006. PubMed ID: 16799052, Table 3; Kajiwara et al. 1994. PubMed ID: 8202715, families #6285, #6935 and #5509; Dryja et al. 1997. PubMed ID: 9331261, family #0782). Kajiwara et al. showed that the individuals who are heterozygous carriers for either PRPH2 c.554T>C or ROM1 c.339dup were asymptomatic and affected patients were combined heterozygotes for PRPH2 and ROM1 variants. Mouse model studies also supported the digenic inheritance of RP (Kedzierski et al. 2001. PubMed ID: 11427722). Of note, protein truncating variants surrounding this region have been documented in individuals with autosomal dominant and digenic forms of retinal disorders (Zernant et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35353811; Panneman et al. 2023. PubMed ID: 36819107). This variant is reported in 0.52% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD. This variant is interpreted as likely pathogenic. -

Retinitis pigmentosa 7 Uncertain:1
May 03, 2020
Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
May 27, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: ROM1 c.339dupG (p.Leu114AlafsX18) results in a premature termination codon, predicted to cause absence of the protein due to nonsense mediated decay, however current evidence is not sufficient to establish loss of function as a mechanism for disease. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00072 in 1576808 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0031 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ROM1 causing Retinitis Pigmentosa 7 phenotype. c.339dupG has been observed in individuals affected with Retinitis Pigmentosa or other inhertied retinal diseases (e.g., Kajiwara_1994, Bascom_1995, Yohe_2020, Panneman_2023, Hitti-Malin_2024). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Retinitis Pigmentosa 7. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 8202715, 31816670, 36819107, 8595413, 38540785). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 12998). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
1.4
Mutation Taster
=13/187
disease causing (ClinVar)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs71458427; hg19: chr11-62381083; COSMIC: COSV53881661; COSMIC: COSV53881661; API