11-64805650-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001370259.2(MEN1):​c.1170G>A​(p.Pro390=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000929 in 1,613,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000097 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MEN1
NM_001370259.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.00
Variant links:
Genes affected
MEN1 (HGNC:7010): (menin 1) This gene encodes menin, a tumor suppressor associated with a syndrome known as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Menin is a scaffold protein that functions in histone modification and epigenetic gene regulation. It is thought to regulate several pathways and processes by altering chromatin structure through the modification of histones. [provided by RefSeq, May 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 11-64805650-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-64805650-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 215540.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000971 (142/1461666) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0023 (103/44720). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00194. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 59 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MEN1NM_001370259.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1170G>A p.Pro390= synonymous_variant 8/10 ENST00000450708.7 NP_001357188.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MEN1ENST00000450708.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1170G>A p.Pro390= synonymous_variant 8/105 NM_001370259.2 ENSP00000394933 P3O00255-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000438
AC:
110
AN:
250900
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000280
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
135766
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000617
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000882
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000971
AC:
142
AN:
1461666
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000811
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
727134
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000144
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000116
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000672
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74358
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000868
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000162

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 17, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 25, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 15, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthJan 11, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 06, 2022- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 12, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 09, 2022The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Computational tools yielded predictions that this variant is unlikely to have an effect on normal RNA splicing. This nucleotide position exhibits low evolutionary conservation. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 27, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 25, 2015This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 29, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
0.083
DANN
Benign
0.85
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587780841; hg19: chr11-64573122; API