11-64808033-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 3P and 13B. PM5PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001370259.2(MEN1):c.512G>A(p.Arg171Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0176 in 1,614,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 313 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R171W) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001370259.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEN1 | NM_001370259.2 | c.512G>A | p.Arg171Gln | missense_variant | 3/10 | ENST00000450708.7 | NP_001357188.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEN1 | ENST00000450708.7 | c.512G>A | p.Arg171Gln | missense_variant | 3/10 | 5 | NM_001370259.2 | ENSP00000394933 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0127 AC: 1935AN: 152160Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0120 AC: 3017AN: 250912Hom.: 25 AF XY: 0.0120 AC XY: 1632AN XY: 135688
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0181 AC: 26503AN: 1461800Hom.: 299 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0174 AC XY: 12671AN XY: 727198
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0127 AC: 1935AN: 152278Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0124 AC XY: 924AN XY: 74446
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:7Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 28, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | Variant interpretted as Likely benign and reported on 10/30/2014 by GTR ID 320384. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 29, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Mar 11, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 17, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc | Nov 01, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:7Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 20, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 01, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22995991, 20981092, 21521296, 22703879, 24997771, 21819486, 24728327, 18221402, 27153395, 30324798, 30869828) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 28, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | MEN1: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Feb 04, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 19, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 24, 2020 | - - |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | May 05, 2015 | - - |
Hyperparathyroidism Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at