Menu
GeneBe

11-65866803-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):c.*115G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0015 in 1,376,880 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

EFEMP2
NM_016938.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00004855
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.48
Variant links:
Genes affected
EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
MUS81 (HGNC:29814): (MUS81 structure-specific endonuclease subunit) This gene encodes a structure-specific endonuclease which belongs to the XPF/MUS81 endonuclease family and plays a critical role in the resolution of recombination intermediates during DNA repair after inter-strand cross-links, replication fork collapse, and DNA double-strand breaks. The encoded protein associates with one of two closely related essential meiotic endonuclease proteins (EME1 or EME2) to form a complex that processes DNA secondary structures. It contains an N-terminal DEAH helicase domain, an excision repair cross complementation group 4 (ERCC4) endonuclease domain, and two tandem C-terminal helix-hairpin-helix domains. Mice with a homozygous knockout of the orthologous gene have significant meiotic defects including the failure to repair a subset of DNA double strand breaks. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 11-65866803-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65866803-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 305375.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
EFEMP2NM_016938.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*115G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 11/11 ENST00000307998.11
EFEMP2NR_037718.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.1530+42G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
MUS81NR_146598.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.1813-454C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
EFEMP2ENST00000307998.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.*115G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 11/111 NM_016938.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00210
AC:
319
AN:
152014
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00223
AC:
358
AN:
160392
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00207
AC XY:
179
AN XY:
86292
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0196
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00142
AC:
1744
AN:
1224746
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
18
AF XY:
0.00137
AC XY:
841
AN XY:
613030
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000354
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000414
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000261
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000815
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00150
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00210
AC:
319
AN:
152134
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00260
AC XY:
193
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000949
Alfa
AF:
0.00398
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000480
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 17, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Benign
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000049
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.070
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs187686630; hg19: chr11-65634274; API