chr11-65866803-C-T

Position:

chr11-65866803-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):c.*115G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0015 in 1,376,880 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

EFEMP2
NM_016938.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.00004855

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.48

Variant links:

Genes affected

EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

EFEMP2 links:

MUS81 (HGNC:29814): (MUS81 structure-specific endonuclease subunit) This gene encodes a structure-specific endonuclease which belongs to the XPF/MUS81 endonuclease family and plays a critical role in the resolution of recombination intermediates during DNA repair after inter-strand cross-links, replication fork collapse, and DNA double-strand breaks. The encoded protein associates with one of two closely related essential meiotic endonuclease proteins (EME1 or EME2) to form a complex that processes DNA secondary structures. It contains an N-terminal DEAH helicase domain, an excision repair cross complementation group 4 (ERCC4) endonuclease domain, and two tandem C-terminal helix-hairpin-helix domains. Mice with a homozygous knockout of the orthologous gene have significant meiotic defects including the failure to repair a subset of DNA double strand breaks. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]

MUS81 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).

BP6

Variant 11-65866803-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65866803-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 305375.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE
EFEMP2	NM_016938.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.*115G>A	3_prime_UTR_variant	11/11	ENST00000307998.11
EFEMP2	NR_037718.2 linkuse as main transcript	n.1530+42G>A	intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
MUS81	NR_146598.2 linkuse as main transcript	n.1813-454C>T	intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
EFEMP2	ENST00000307998.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.*115G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	11/11	1	NM_016938.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00210

AC:

319

AN:

152014

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0161

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00210

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000959

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00223

AC:

358

AN:

160392

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00207

AC XY:

179

AN XY:

86292

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0196

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00107

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00244

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00142

AC:

1744

AN:

1224746

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00137

AC XY:

841

AN XY:

613030

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000354

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000414

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000261

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0194

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000815

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00150

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00210

AC:

319

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00260

AC XY:

193

AN XY:

74372

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0161

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00210

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000949

Alfa

AF:

0.00398

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000480

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Jul 17, 2018

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.69

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.000049

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.070

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over