11-65866939-A-C

Position:

• chr11-65866939-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2 PP3

The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):​c.1311T>G​(p.Phe437Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 6.8e-7 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: EFEMP2 NM_016938.5 missense
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.522

Genes affected

EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

MUS81 (HGNC:29814): (MUS81 structure-specific endonuclease subunit) This gene encodes a structure-specific endonuclease which belongs to the XPF/MUS81 endonuclease family and plays a critical role in the resolution of recombination intermediates during DNA repair after inter-strand cross-links, replication fork collapse, and DNA double-strand breaks. The encoded protein associates with one of two closely related essential meiotic endonuclease proteins (EME1 or EME2) to form a complex that processes DNA secondary structures. It contains an N-terminal DEAH helicase domain, an excision repair cross complementation group 4 (ERCC4) endonuclease domain, and two tandem C-terminal helix-hairpin-helix domains. Mice with a homozygous knockout of the orthologous gene have significant meiotic defects including the failure to repair a subset of DNA double strand breaks. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• PP3: Splicing scoreres supports a deletorius effect: Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
EFEMP2	NM_016938.5	c.1311T>G	p.Phe437Leu	missense_variant	11/11	ENST00000307998.11
EFEMP2	NR_037718.2	n.1436T>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	11/12
MUS81	NR_146598.2	n.1813-318A>C		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
EFEMP2	ENST00000307998.11	c.1311T>G	p.Phe437Leu	missense_variant	11/11	1	NM_016938.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32

GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1 AN: 1461876 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 727240

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 8.99e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Mar 30, 2021

EFEMP2 NM_016938.4 exon 11 p.Phe437Leu (c.1311T>G): This variant has not been reported in the literature and is not present in large control databases. Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. Splice prediction tools suggest that this variant may affect splicing. However, further studies are needed to understand its impact. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Pathogenic	0.99
BayesDel_addAF	Uncertain	0.064	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.15
CADD	Pathogenic	27
DANN	Uncertain	1.0
DEOGEN2	Uncertain	0.57	D
Eigen	Benign	-0.49
Eigen_PC	Benign	-0.39
FATHMM_MKL	Uncertain	0.77	D
LIST_S2	Benign	0.81	T
M_CAP	Benign	0.044	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.34	T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.64	T
MutationAssessor	Uncertain	2.0	M
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	D;D
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.72	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-2.1	N
REVEL	Uncertain	0.44
Sift	Benign	0.043	D
Sift4G	Benign	0.084	T
Polyphen		0.13	B
Vest4		0.29
MutPred		0.53		Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.096);
MVP		0.75
MPC		0.44
ClinPred		0.43	T
GERP RS		-0.12
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.6
Varity_R		0.13
gMVP		0.67

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.63		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai		0.63		Position offset: 0

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1591064625; hg19: chr11-65634410;