11-65867062-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):c.1188C>T(p.Ser396=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00238 in 1,614,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
EFEMP2
NM_016938.5 synonymous
NM_016938.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.00400
Genes affected
EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
MUS81 (HGNC:29814): (MUS81 structure-specific endonuclease subunit) This gene encodes a structure-specific endonuclease which belongs to the XPF/MUS81 endonuclease family and plays a critical role in the resolution of recombination intermediates during DNA repair after inter-strand cross-links, replication fork collapse, and DNA double-strand breaks. The encoded protein associates with one of two closely related essential meiotic endonuclease proteins (EME1 or EME2) to form a complex that processes DNA secondary structures. It contains an N-terminal DEAH helicase domain, an excision repair cross complementation group 4 (ERCC4) endonuclease domain, and two tandem C-terminal helix-hairpin-helix domains. Mice with a homozygous knockout of the orthologous gene have significant meiotic defects including the failure to repair a subset of DNA double strand breaks. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 11-65867062-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65867062-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 305377.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr11-65867062-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-65867062-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.004 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00246 (3593/1461820) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00266 (2959/1111998). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00258. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1746 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEMP2 | NM_016938.5 | c.1188C>T | p.Ser396= | synonymous_variant | 11/11 | ENST00000307998.11 | |
EFEMP2 | NR_037718.2 | n.1313C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 11/12 | |||
MUS81 | NR_146598.2 | n.1813-195G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEMP2 | ENST00000307998.11 | c.1188C>T | p.Ser396= | synonymous_variant | 11/11 | 1 | NM_016938.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00168 AC: 255AN: 152156Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
255
AN:
152156
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00215 AC: 539AN: 251228Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00206 AC XY: 280AN XY: 135866
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
539
AN:
251228
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
135866
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00246 AC: 3593AN: 1461820Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00240 AC XY: 1746AN XY: 727208
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3593
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1746
AN XY:
727208
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00167 AC: 255AN: 152274Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00205 AC XY: 153AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
255
AN:
152274
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Jan 12, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 26, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2023 | EFEMP2: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 22, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 14, 2017 | Variant summary: The EFEMP2 c.1188C>T (p.Ser396Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation taster predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 3/5 splice prediction tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may create a new binding site for SC35. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 240/120628 control chromosomes from ExAC, predominantly observed in the European (Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.011343 (74/6524). This frequency is about 101 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic EFEMP2 variant (0.0001118), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Finnish) origin. Similar frequency in European (Finnish) subpopulation (0.01098; 283/25780 chromosomes) has also been detected in gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. One clinical diagnostic laboratory (via ClinVar) has classified this variant as uncertain significance without evidence to independently evaluate. To our knowledge, this variant has not been published in affected individuals in literature. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Mar 31, 2023 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 25, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
EFEMP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 03, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at