chr11-65867062-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):​c.1188C>T​(p.Ser396=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00238 in 1,614,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

EFEMP2
NM_016938.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.00400
Variant links:
Genes affected
EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
MUS81 (HGNC:29814): (MUS81 structure-specific endonuclease subunit) This gene encodes a structure-specific endonuclease which belongs to the XPF/MUS81 endonuclease family and plays a critical role in the resolution of recombination intermediates during DNA repair after inter-strand cross-links, replication fork collapse, and DNA double-strand breaks. The encoded protein associates with one of two closely related essential meiotic endonuclease proteins (EME1 or EME2) to form a complex that processes DNA secondary structures. It contains an N-terminal DEAH helicase domain, an excision repair cross complementation group 4 (ERCC4) endonuclease domain, and two tandem C-terminal helix-hairpin-helix domains. Mice with a homozygous knockout of the orthologous gene have significant meiotic defects including the failure to repair a subset of DNA double strand breaks. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 11-65867062-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65867062-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 305377.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr11-65867062-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-65867062-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.004 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00246 (3593/1461820) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00266 (2959/1111998). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00258. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1746 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
EFEMP2NM_016938.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1188C>T p.Ser396= synonymous_variant 11/11 ENST00000307998.11
EFEMP2NR_037718.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.1313C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 11/12
MUS81NR_146598.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.1813-195G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
EFEMP2ENST00000307998.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1188C>T p.Ser396= synonymous_variant 11/111 NM_016938.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00168
AC:
255
AN:
152156
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000507
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00175
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00215
AC:
539
AN:
251228
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00206
AC XY:
280
AN XY:
135866
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0116
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00246
AC:
3593
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00240
AC XY:
1746
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00974
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00266
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00142
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00167
AC:
255
AN:
152274
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00205
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000505
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00175
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00202
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00109
EpiCase
AF:
0.00196
EpiControl
AF:
0.00172

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterJun 28, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterJan 12, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 26, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2023EFEMP2: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 22, 2021- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 14, 2017Variant summary: The EFEMP2 c.1188C>T (p.Ser396Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation taster predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 3/5 splice prediction tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may create a new binding site for SC35. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 240/120628 control chromosomes from ExAC, predominantly observed in the European (Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.011343 (74/6524). This frequency is about 101 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic EFEMP2 variant (0.0001118), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Finnish) origin. Similar frequency in European (Finnish) subpopulation (0.01098; 283/25780 chromosomes) has also been detected in gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. One clinical diagnostic laboratory (via ClinVar) has classified this variant as uncertain significance without evidence to independently evaluate. To our knowledge, this variant has not been published in affected individuals in literature. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMar 31, 2023- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 25, 2019This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
EFEMP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 03, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2234473; hg19: chr11-65634533; COSMIC: COSV57261728; COSMIC: COSV57261728; API