11-66070592-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 1P and 6B. PP2BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_018026.4(PACS1):āc.106C>Gā(p.Gln36Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000119 in 1,506,602 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018026.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PACS1 | NM_018026.4 | c.106C>G | p.Gln36Glu | missense_variant | 1/24 | ENST00000320580.9 | NP_060496.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PACS1 | ENST00000320580.9 | c.106C>G | p.Gln36Glu | missense_variant | 1/24 | 1 | NM_018026.4 | ENSP00000316454 | P2 | |
PACS1 | ENST00000527224.1 | n.230C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/7 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000659 AC: 1AN: 151792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000125 AC: 17AN: 1354810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000896 AC XY: 6AN XY: 670000
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000659 AC: 1AN: 151792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74126
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 24, 2020 | Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at