11-68032291-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_002496.4(NDUFS8):​c.64C>T​(p.Pro22Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000116 in 1,613,830 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NDUFS8
NM_002496.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.462
Variant links:
Genes affected
NDUFS8 (HGNC:7715): (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S8) This gene encodes a subunit of mitochondrial NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, or Complex I, a multimeric enzyme of the respiratory chain responsible for NADH oxidation, ubiquinone reduction, and the ejection of protons from mitochondria. The encoded protein is involved in the binding of two of the six to eight iron-sulfur clusters of Complex I and, as such, is required in the electron transfer process. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Leigh syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013738483).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000118 (18/152330) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0029 (14/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00175. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 11 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NDUFS8NM_002496.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.64C>T p.Pro22Ser missense_variant 3/7 ENST00000313468.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NDUFS8ENST00000313468.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.64C>T p.Pro22Ser missense_variant 3/71 NM_002496.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000118
AC:
18
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000915
AC:
23
AN:
251382
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000957
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000116
AC:
169
AN:
1461500
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.000142
AC XY:
103
AN XY:
727050
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000626
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000917
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000118
AC:
18
AN:
152330
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000130
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000680
ExAC
AF:
0.000107
AC:
13
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Leigh syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsMay 24, 2018This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 04, 2021In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 06, 2023This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 22 of the NDUFS8 protein (p.Pro22Ser). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with NDUFS8-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 214835). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The serine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Mitochondrial complex I deficiency Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.065
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
9.1
DANN
Benign
0.72
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.33
T;T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.060
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.45
T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.040
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.44
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.080
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.43
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.46
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;B;.
Vest4
0.15
MutPred
0.22
Loss of catalytic residue at P21 (P = 0.0179);Loss of catalytic residue at P21 (P = 0.0179);Loss of catalytic residue at P21 (P = 0.0179);Loss of catalytic residue at P21 (P = 0.0179);
MVP
0.84
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.0072
T
GERP RS
-1.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.017
gMVP
0.37

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs369602258; hg19: chr11-67799758; API