11-77157326-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The ENST00000409709.9(MYO7A):āc.783T>Cā(p.Gly261Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.379 in 1,610,282 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 123,664 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G261G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000409709.9 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | NM_000260.4 | c.783T>C | p.Gly261Gly | synonymous_variant | 8/49 | ENST00000409709.9 | NP_000251.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | ENST00000409709.9 | c.783T>C | p.Gly261Gly | synonymous_variant | 8/49 | 1 | NM_000260.4 | ENSP00000386331.3 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000458637.6 | c.783T>C | p.Gly261Gly | synonymous_variant | 8/49 | 1 | ENSP00000392185.2 | |||
MYO7A | ENST00000409619.6 | c.750T>C | p.Gly250Gly | synonymous_variant | 9/50 | 1 | ENSP00000386635.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.487 AC: 73932AN: 151848Hom.: 20543 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.388 AC: 94800AN: 244088Hom.: 20132 AF XY: 0.370 AC XY: 49033AN XY: 132382
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.367 AC: 535874AN: 1458316Hom.: 103075 Cov.: 40 AF XY: 0.362 AC XY: 262121AN XY: 725086
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.487 AC: 74031AN: 151966Hom.: 20589 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.486 AC XY: 36136AN XY: 74280
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 07, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 08, 2007 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 1;C1832475:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11;C1838701:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 11, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at