12-106992978-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_004075.5(CRY1):c.1644C>G(p.His548Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000217 in 1,613,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004075.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRY1 | ENST00000008527.10 | c.1644C>G | p.His548Gln | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 13 | 1 | NM_004075.5 | ENSP00000008527.5 | ||
CRY1 | ENST00000549356.1 | c.204C>G | p.His68Gln | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 4 | 3 | ENSP00000447738.1 | |||
CRY1 | ENST00000552790.5 | n.2223C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 13 of 13 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251400Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135872
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000226 AC: 33AN: 1461760Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19AN XY: 727170
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.1644C>G (p.H548Q) alteration is located in exon 11 (coding exon 11) of the CRY1 gene. This alteration results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 1644, causing the histidine (H) at amino acid position 548 to be replaced by a glutamine (Q). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at