12-120978841-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM1_SupportingPM2_Supporting
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.73G>C variant in the HNF1 homeobox A gene, HNF1A, causes an amino acid change of alanine to proline at codon 25 (p.(Ala25Pro)) of NM_000545.8. This variant is located within the DNA dimerization domain (codons 1-32) of HNF1A, which is defined as critical for the protein’s function by the ClinGen MDEP (PM1_Supporting) and is absent from gnomAD v2.1.1 (PM2_Supporting). This variant has a REVEL score of 0.684, which is between the ClinGen MDEP thresholds for BP4 and PP3, predicting neither a damaging nor benign impact on HNF1A function. This variant was identified in an individual with a MODY Probability Calculator score > 50% and antibody-negative; however, HNF4A was not tested, so PP4 cannot be applied (PMID:15841481). This variant was identified in two unrelated individuals with non-autoimmune and non-absolute/near-absolute insulin-deficient diabetes; however, PS4_Moderate cannot be applied because this number is below the ClinGen MDEP threshold (PMIDs: 15841481, 21224407). In summary, c.73G>C meets the criteria to be classified as a variant of uncertain significance for monogenic diabetes. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen MDEP (specification version 2.1.0, approved 8/11/2023): PM1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA386952675/MONDO:0015967/017
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000545.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNF1A | NM_000545.8 | c.73G>C | p.Ala25Pro | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | ENST00000257555.11 | NP_000536.6 | |
| HNF1A | NM_001306179.2 | c.73G>C | p.Ala25Pro | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | NP_001293108.2 | ||
| HNF1A | NM_001406915.1 | c.73G>C | p.Ala25Pro | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 9 | NP_001393844.1 | ||
| HNF1A | XM_024449168.2 | c.73G>C | p.Ala25Pro | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 9 | XP_024304936.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNF1A | ENST00000257555.11 | c.73G>C | p.Ala25Pro | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | 1 | NM_000545.8 | ENSP00000257555.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 46
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Monogenic diabetes Uncertain:1
The c.73G>C variant in the HNF1 homeobox A gene, HNF1A, causes an amino acid change of alanine to proline at codon 25 (p.(Ala25Pro)) of NM_000545.8. This variant is located within the DNA dimerization domain (codons 1-32) of HNF1A, which is defined as critical for the protein’s function by the ClinGen MDEP (PM1_Supporting) and is absent from gnomAD v2.1.1 (PM2_Supporting). This variant has a REVEL score of 0.684, which is between the ClinGen MDEP thresholds for BP4 and PP3, predicting neither a damaging nor benign impact on HNF1A function. This variant was identified in an individual with a MODY Probability Calculator score > 50% and antibody-negative; however, HNF4A was not tested, so PP4 cannot be applied (PMID: 15841481). This variant was identified in two unrelated individuals with non-autoimmune and non-absolute/near-absolute insulin-deficient diabetes; however, PS4_Moderate cannot be applied because this number is below the ClinGen MDEP threshold (PMIDs: 15841481, 21224407). In summary, c.73G>C meets the criteria to be classified as a variant of uncertain significance for monogenic diabetes. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen MDEP (specification version 2.1.0, approved 8/11/2023): PM1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at