12-120999581-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000545.8(HNF1A):​c.1722C>A​(p.Ser574Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00018 in 1,612,424 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S574G) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00093 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

HNF1A
NM_000545.8 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications B:5O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.41
Variant links:
Genes affected
HNF1A (HGNC:11621): (HNF1 homeobox A) The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor required for the expression of several liver-specific genes. The encoded protein functions as a homodimer and binds to the inverted palindrome 5'-GTTAATNATTAAC-3'. Defects in this gene are a cause of maturity onset diabetes of the young type 3 (MODY3) and also can result in the appearance of hepatic adenomas. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011299312).
BP6
Variant 12-120999581-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-120999581-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 393435.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_risk_allele=1, Benign=2}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 141 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
HNF1ANM_000545.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1722C>A p.Ser574Arg missense_variant 9/10 ENST00000257555.11
HNF1ANM_001306179.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1743C>A p.Ser581Arg missense_variant 9/10
HNF1ANM_001406915.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1530C>A p.Ser510Arg missense_variant 8/9
HNF1AXM_024449168.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1815C>A p.Ser605Arg missense_variant 8/9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
HNF1AENST00000257555.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1722C>A p.Ser574Arg missense_variant 9/101 NM_000545.8 P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000926
AC:
141
AN:
152236
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000243
AC:
59
AN:
242772
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
132392
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000103
AC:
150
AN:
1460070
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0000771
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
726378
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00406
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000995
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000925
AC:
141
AN:
152354
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000966
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
74502
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000947
Alfa
AF:
0.00121
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00103
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00251
AC:
11
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000297
AC:
36

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Benign:5Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 06, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMar 05, 2018- -
Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain risk allele, criteria provided, single submitterresearchClinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic-Mutations in HNF1A gene can predispose to MODY3. It is associated with both micro and macrovascular complications of diabetes, especially cardiovascular complications. Associated with glucosuria. May respond well to sulfonylureas. However, more evidence is required to confer the association of this particular variant rs141304623 with MODY3. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 13, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchPersonalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of MedicineNov 10, 2015ACMG Criteria: PP3, BS2 (type2diabetesgenetics.org), BP4 -
HNF1A-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 07, 2021This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.22
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.10
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.53
.;D;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.39
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.25
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.60
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.27
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.39
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;.;.;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.38
Sift
Benign
0.048
D;.;.;D;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.46
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.018
.;.;.;.;B
Vest4
0.25
MutPred
0.44
.;.;.;.;Loss of glycosylation at S581 (P = 0.0238);
MVP
0.84
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.056
T
GERP RS
2.4
gMVP
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141304623; hg19: chr12-121437384; API