12-12718831-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_004064.5(CDKN1B):c.482C>G(p.Ser161Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004064.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN1B | NM_004064.5 | c.482C>G | p.Ser161Cys | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000228872.9 | NP_004055.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN1B | ENST00000228872.9 | c.482C>G | p.Ser161Cys | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_004064.5 | ENSP00000228872 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000175 AC: 44AN: 251200Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000221 AC XY: 30AN XY: 135834
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000161 AC: 235AN: 1461842Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000171 AC XY: 124AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2022 | CDKN1B: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 16, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 13, 2024 | In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PMID: 35355569); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 36520683, 23505216, 35355569) - |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 161 of the CDKN1B protein (p.Ser161Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs373917399, gnomAD 0.04%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of multiple endocrine neoplasia (PMID: 35355569). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 239625). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 18, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 27, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
CDKN1B-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 08, 2023 | The CDKN1B c.482C>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ser161Cys. This variant has been reported in an individual with multiple endocrine neoplasia (Lavezzi et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35355569). This variant is reported in 0.039% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD, including one homozygous observation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-12871765-C-G). It has conflicting interpretations of benign, likely benign, and uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/239625/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at