12-56450665-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_012064.4(MIP):c.*615A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0443 in 153,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 492 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.045 ( 492 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MIP
NM_012064.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_012064.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0200
Genes affected
MIP (HGNC:7103): (major intrinsic protein of lens fiber) Major intrinsic protein is a member of the water-transporting aquaporins as well as the original member of the MIP family of channel proteins. The function of the fiber cell membrane protein encoded by this gene is undetermined, yet this protein is speculated to play a role in intracellular communication. The MIP protein is expressed in the ocular lens and is required for correct lens function. This gene has been mapped among aquaporins AQP2, AQP5, and AQP6, in a potential gene cluster at 12q13. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 12-56450665-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-56450665-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 309873.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.148 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIP | NM_012064.4 | c.*615A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000652304.1 | NP_036196.1 | ||
MIP | XM_011538354.2 | c.*615A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/6 | XP_011536656.1 | |||
MIP | XM_017019306.2 | c.*615A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | XP_016874795.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIP | ENST00000652304.1 | c.*615A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 4/4 | NM_012064.4 | ENSP00000498622 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0445 AC: 6765AN: 152098Hom.: 493 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6765
AN:
152098
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00368 AC: 3AN: 816Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00216 AC XY: 1AN XY: 462
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
816
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
462
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0445 AC: 6775AN: 152216Hom.: 492 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0435 AC XY: 3237AN XY: 74438
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6775
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3237
AN XY:
74438
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Cataract 15 multiple types Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at