12-6935820-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The ENST00000396684.3(ATN1):āc.553C>Gā(p.Pro185Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000322 in 1,613,764 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000396684.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATN1 | NM_001940.4 | c.553C>G | p.Pro185Ala | missense_variant | 5/10 | ENST00000396684.3 | NP_001931.2 | |
ATN1 | NM_001007026.2 | c.553C>G | p.Pro185Ala | missense_variant | 5/10 | NP_001007027.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATN1 | ENST00000396684.3 | c.553C>G | p.Pro185Ala | missense_variant | 5/10 | 1 | NM_001940.4 | ENSP00000379915 | P1 | |
ATN1 | ENST00000356654.8 | c.553C>G | p.Pro185Ala | missense_variant | 5/10 | 1 | ENSP00000349076 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152076Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000280 AC: 7AN: 250032Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000148 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135268
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000315 AC: 46AN: 1461688Hom.: 0 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.0000289 AC XY: 21AN XY: 727174
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152076Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74278
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at