12-88129717-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):​c.829G>C​(p.Glu277Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0177 in 1,448,302 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 309 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.016 ( 27 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.018 ( 282 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 missense

Scores

1
7
10

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.02

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CEP290 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • CEP290-related ciliopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Joubert syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Leber congenital amaurosis 10
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Leber congenital amaurosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Senior-Loken syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00445202).
BP6
Variant 12-88129717-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88129717-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 126269.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0161 (2450/151870) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0236 (122/5178). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0203. There are 27 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1214 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 27 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CEP290NM_025114.4 linkc.829G>C p.Glu277Gln missense_variant Exon 10 of 54 ENST00000552810.6 NP_079390.3 O15078Q05BJ6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEP290ENST00000552810.6 linkc.829G>C p.Glu277Gln missense_variant Exon 10 of 54 1 NM_025114.4 ENSP00000448012.1 O15078

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0161
AC:
2445
AN:
151752
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00785
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0235
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0259
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00645
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0240
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0136
AC:
1528
AN:
112520
AF XY:
0.0126
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00607
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0179
AC:
23178
AN:
1296432
Hom.:
282
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
0.0176
AC XY:
11310
AN XY:
642210
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00613
AC:
163
AN:
26586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0129
AC:
332
AN:
25648
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00132
AC:
31
AN:
23450
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0413
AC:
1310
AN:
31750
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00335
AC:
237
AN:
70656
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0235
AC:
1139
AN:
48412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00429
AC:
23
AN:
5364
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0189
AC:
19119
AN:
1010682
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0153
AC:
824
AN:
53884
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.440
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
868
1735
2603
3470
4338
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
742
1484
2226
2968
3710
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0161
AC:
2450
AN:
151870
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0164
AC XY:
1214
AN XY:
74214
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00795
AC:
330
AN:
41534
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0223
AC:
339
AN:
15224
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0236
AC:
122
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00291
AC:
14
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0259
AC:
274
AN:
10578
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00347
AC:
1
AN:
288
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0190
AC:
1289
AN:
67770
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0238
AC:
50
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
116
231
347
462
578
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
32
64
96
128
160
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0152
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.0146
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0227
AC:
84
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0226
AC:
87
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00751
AC:
26
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0171
AC:
132
ExAC
AF:
0.00627
AC:
562
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0100
AC:
36
AN:
3446

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CEP290: BS1, BS2 -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27894351, 27884173, 21153841) -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:5
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 10, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 23, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Joubert syndrome 5 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.31
.;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.60
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.54
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0045
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.61
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
.;M;.
PhyloP100
7.0
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Benign
0.11
T;T;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.024
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.
Vest4
0.39
MPC
0.24
ClinPred
0.0071
T
GERP RS
4.7
PromoterAI
0.0034
Neutral
Varity_R
0.25
gMVP
0.47
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45502896; hg19: chr12-88523494; API