12-88129717-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The ENST00000552810.6(CEP290):ā€‹c.829G>Cā€‹(p.Glu277Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0177 in 1,448,302 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 309 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.016 ( 27 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.018 ( 282 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
ENST00000552810.6 missense

Scores

1
7
10

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.02
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00445202).
BP6
Variant 12-88129717-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88129717-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 126269.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-88129717-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr12-88129717-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-88129717-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0161 (2450/151870) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0236 (122/5178). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0203. There are 27 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1214 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 27 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CEP290NM_025114.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.829G>C p.Glu277Gln missense_variant 10/54 ENST00000552810.6 NP_079390.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEP290ENST00000552810.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.829G>C p.Glu277Gln missense_variant 10/541 NM_025114.4 ENSP00000448012 P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0161
AC:
2445
AN:
151752
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00785
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0235
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0259
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00645
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0240
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0136
AC:
1528
AN:
112520
Hom.:
19
AF XY:
0.0126
AC XY:
760
AN XY:
60462
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00607
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00281
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0179
AC:
23178
AN:
1296432
Hom.:
282
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
0.0176
AC XY:
11310
AN XY:
642210
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00613
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0129
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00132
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0413
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00335
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0235
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0189
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0153
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0161
AC:
2450
AN:
151870
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0164
AC XY:
1214
AN XY:
74214
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00795
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0236
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0259
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0238
Alfa
AF:
0.0152
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.0146
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0227
AC:
84
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0226
AC:
87
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00751
AC:
26
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0171
AC:
132
ExAC
AF:
0.00627
AC:
562
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0100
AC:
36
AN:
3446

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27894351, 27884173, 21153841) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024CEP290: BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 10, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 23, 2014- -
Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Leber congenital amaurosis Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Meckel syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -
Joubert syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.31
.;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.60
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.54
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0045
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.61
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
.;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Benign
0.11
T;T;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.024
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.
Vest4
0.39
MPC
0.24
ClinPred
0.0071
T
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.25
gMVP
0.47

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45502896; hg19: chr12-88523494; API