13-102873269-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.2890C>T(p.Arg964Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000237 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.50

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

ERCC5 links:

BIVM-ERCC5 (HGNC:43690): (BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) and ERCC5 (excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5) genes on chromosome 13. The read-through transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with the products of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

BIVM-ERCC5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012886673).

BP6

Variant 13-102873269-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102873269-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134165.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000248 (362/1461794) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00357 (308/86256). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00324. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 253 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC5	NM_000123.4 link	c.2890C>T	p.Arg964Trp	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 15	ENST00000652225.2	NP_000114.3	P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5	NM_001204425.2 link	c.4252C>T	p.Arg1418Trp	missense_variant	Exon 22 of 23		NP_001191354.2	R4GMW8Q59FZ7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC5	ENST00000652225.2 link	c.2890C>T	p.Arg964Trp	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 15		NM_000123.4	ENSP00000498881.2	P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5	ENST00000639435.1 link	c.4252C>T	p.Arg1418Trp	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 25	5		ENSP00000491742.1	R4GMW8
BIVM-ERCC5	ENST00000639132.1 link	c.3565C>T	p.Arg1189Trp	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	5		ENSP00000492684.1	A0A1W2PS85

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000125

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00332

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000497

AC:

125

AN:

251442

AF XY:

0.000714

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000791

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000248

AC:

362

AN:

1461794

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000348

AC XY:

253

AN XY:

727208

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39678

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00357

AC:

308

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53412

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000342

AC:

AN:

1111962

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000149

AC:

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.436

Heterozygous variant carriers

109

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152240

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41542

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00353

AC:

AN:

4816

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10594

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000271

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000529

ExAC

AF:

0.000535

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Dec 31, 2019

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 13, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 28991257, 26344056) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1

Jul 26, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not specified

Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:reference population

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.28

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.19

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.050

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.39

.;.;.;T;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.56

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.53

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.87

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;D;.;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.13

MetaRNN

Benign

0.013

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.040

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.2

.;.;.;M;.

PhyloP100

3.5

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-4.2

.;.;.;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.60

Sift

Uncertain

0.0040

.;.;.;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.012

.;.;.;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

.;.;.;D;.

Vest4

0.52, 0.57

MutPred

0.54

.;.;.;Gain of catalytic residue at E960 (P = 0.0691);.;

MVP

0.91

MPC

0.56

ClinPred

0.22

GERP RS

4.7

Varity_R

0.35

gMVP

0.41

Mutation Taster

=93/7

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over