13-102873269-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.2890C>T(p.Arg964Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000237 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
ERCC5
NM_000123.4 missense
NM_000123.4 missense
Scores
1
12
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.50
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012886673).
BP6
Variant 13-102873269-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102873269-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134165.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3, not_provided=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000131 (20/152240) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00353 (17/4816). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00225. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 11 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | NM_000123.4 | c.2890C>T | p.Arg964Trp | missense_variant | 14/15 | ENST00000652225.2 | NP_000114.3 | |
BIVM-ERCC5 | NM_001204425.2 | c.4252C>T | p.Arg1418Trp | missense_variant | 22/23 | NP_001191354.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | ENST00000652225.2 | c.2890C>T | p.Arg964Trp | missense_variant | 14/15 | NM_000123.4 | ENSP00000498881 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152122Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
19
AN:
152122
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000497 AC: 125AN: 251442Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000714 AC XY: 97AN XY: 135890
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
125
AN:
251442
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
97
AN XY:
135890
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000248 AC: 362AN: 1461794Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000348 AC XY: 253AN XY: 727208
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
362
AN:
1461794
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
253
AN XY:
727208
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74442
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74442
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
65
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 13, 2020 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 28991257, 26344056) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 26, 2021 | - - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;.;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;.;.;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
.;.;.;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
.;.;.;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
.;.;.;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.
Vest4
0.52, 0.57
MutPred
0.54
.;.;.;Gain of catalytic residue at E960 (P = 0.0691);.;
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.56
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at