Menu
GeneBe

rs574826021

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):​c.2890C>T​(p.Arg964Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000237 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 missense

Scores

1
7
4

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.50
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012886673).
BP6
Variant 13-102873269-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102873269-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134165.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3, not_provided=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000131 (20/152240) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00353 (17/4816). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00225. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 11 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ERCC5NM_000123.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2890C>T p.Arg964Trp missense_variant 14/15 ENST00000652225.2
BIVM-ERCC5NM_001204425.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.4252C>T p.Arg1418Trp missense_variant 22/23

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ERCC5ENST00000652225.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2890C>T p.Arg964Trp missense_variant 14/15 NM_000123.4 P1P28715-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152122
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000497
AC:
125
AN:
251442
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000714
AC XY:
97
AN XY:
135890
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00376
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000791
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000248
AC:
362
AN:
1461794
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000348
AC XY:
253
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00357
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000342
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000131
AC:
20
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000422
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000529
ExAC
AF:
0.000535
AC:
65
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 31, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 13, 2020In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 28991257, 26344056) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 26, 2021- -
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.28
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.050
CADD
Pathogenic
30
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.56
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.87
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;.;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.040
D
MutationTaster
Benign
0.96
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.
Vest4
0.52, 0.57
MutPred
0.54
.;.;.;Gain of catalytic residue at E960 (P = 0.0691);.;
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.56
ClinPred
0.22
T
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.35
gMVP
0.41

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs574826021; hg19: chr13-103525619; COSMIC: COSV63244784; COSMIC: COSV63244784; API