13-113129492-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000504.4(F10):c.111G>A(p.Arg37Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00114 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0060 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00064 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

F10
NM_000504.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.607

Variant links:

Genes affected

F10 (HGNC:3528): (coagulation factor X) This gene encodes the vitamin K-dependent coagulation factor X of the blood coagulation cascade. This factor undergoes multiple processing steps before its preproprotein is converted to a mature two-chain form by the excision of the tripeptide RKR. Two chains of the factor are held together by 1 or more disulfide bonds; the light chain contains 2 EGF-like domains, while the heavy chain contains the catalytic domain which is structurally homologous to those of the other hemostatic serine proteases. The mature factor is activated by the cleavage of the activation peptide by factor IXa (in the intrisic pathway), or by factor VIIa (in the extrinsic pathway). The activated factor then converts prothrombin to thrombin in the presence of factor Va, Ca+2, and phospholipid during blood clotting. Mutations of this gene result in factor X deficiency, a hemorrhagic condition of variable severity. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms that may undergo similar proteolytic processing to generate mature polypeptides. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2015]

F10 links:

F10-AS1 (HGNC:40225): (F10 antisense RNA 1)

F10-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 13-113129492-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-113129492-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 717320.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.607 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00599 (911/152194) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0211 (875/41516). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0199. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 426 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
F10	NM_000504.4 link	c.111G>A	p.Arg37Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 8	ENST00000375559.8	NP_000495.1	P00742Q5JVE7
F10	NM_001312674.2 link	c.111G>A	p.Arg37Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 7		NP_001299603.1	P00742
F10	NM_001312675.2 link	c.111G>A	p.Arg37Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 8		NP_001299604.1	P00742Q5JVE8
F10-AS1	NR_126424.1 link	n.41+514C>T		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
F10	ENST00000375559.8 link	c.111G>A	p.Arg37Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 8	1	NM_000504.4	ENSP00000364709.3		P00742

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00598

AC:

910

AN:

152076

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0211

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00210

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00174

AC:

438

AN:

251494

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00115

AC XY:

156

AN XY:

135922

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0245

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000925

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000651

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000639

AC:

934

AN:

1461832

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000572

AC XY:

416

AN XY:

727210

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0232

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000939

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000288

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00136

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00599

AC:

911

AN:

152194

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00573

AC XY:

426

AN XY:

74404

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0211

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00209

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00190

Alfa

AF:

0.00315

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00734

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Dec 31, 2019

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary factor X deficiency disease

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

1.0

DANN

Benign

0.65

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.0

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over