13-20188115-C-T

Position:

• chr13-20188115-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS2_Supporting

The NM_004004.6(GJB2):​c.*786G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0032 in 152,312 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 (7 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 (0 hom.)
  • Failed GnomAD Quality Control
• Consequence: GJB2 NM_004004.6 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.241

Genes affected

GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
• BP6: Variant 13-20188115-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-20188115-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 311363.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AD,AR,Digenic geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GJB2	NM_004004.6	c.*786G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	2/2	ENST00000382848.5	NP_003995.2
GJB2	XM_011535049.3	c.*786G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	2/2		XP_011533351.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GJB2	ENST00000382848	c.*786G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	2/2	1	NM_004004.6	ENSP00000372299.4
GJB2	ENST00000382844	c.*786G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	1/1			ENSP00000372295.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00320 AC: 487 AN: 152194 Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0111

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000851

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00191

GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 6 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 6

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00320 AC: 488 AN: 152312 Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00303 AC XY: 226 AN XY: 74480

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0111

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000850

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00189

Alfa AF: 0.00208 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00312

Asia WGS AF: 0.000577 AC: 2 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.89
CADD	Benign	1.0
DANN	Benign	0.44

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs187158699; hg19: chr13-20762254;