13-21671210-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_002010.3(FGF9):c.-703C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000249 in 152,342 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00025 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Consequence
FGF9
NM_002010.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_002010.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.638
Genes affected
FGF9 (HGNC:3687): (fibroblast growth factor 9) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family. FGF family members possess broad mitogenic and cell survival activities, and are involved in a variety of biological processes, including embryonic development, cell growth, morphogenesis, tissue repair, tumor growth and invasion. This protein was isolated as a secreted factor that exhibits a growth-stimulating effect on cultured glial cells. In nervous system, this protein is produced mainly by neurons and may be important for glial cell development. Expression of the mouse homolog of this gene was found to be dependent on Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. Mice lacking the homolog gene displayed a male-to-female sex reversal phenotype, which suggested a role in testicular embryogenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 38 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGF9 | NM_002010.3 | c.-703C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/3 | ENST00000382353.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGF9 | ENST00000382353.6 | c.-703C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/3 | 1 | NM_002010.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000249 AC: 38AN: 152342Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000255 AC XY: 19AN XY: 74494
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
152342
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
74494
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple synostoses syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at