13-32337387-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.3032C>Gā€‹(p.Thr1011Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000242 in 1,613,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T1011I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

9
5
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.86
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 13-32337387-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32337387-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 37815.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=9}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3032C>G p.Thr1011Arg missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3032C>G p.Thr1011Arg missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152114
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000359
AC:
9
AN:
250670
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135630
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000353
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000233
AC:
34
AN:
1461540
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000151
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
727082
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000234
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152114
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74306
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000676
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000680
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:4Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 20, 2004- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterFeb 21, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJun 14, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 18, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 13, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 10, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSAAug 01, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
not provided Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 24, 2023Published functional studies are inconclusive: spontaneous homologous recombination in human cell line comparable to wildtype, no induction of recombination events in yeast comparable to pathogenic control, impaired binding to APRIN and RAD51 (Balia et al., 2011; Brough et al., 2012; Spugnesi et al., 2013); Observed in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer, but also in cancer-free controls (De Sanjose et al., 2003; Balia et al., 2011; Alsop et al., 2012; Gabald Barrios et al., 2017; Terzic et al., 2020; Dorling et al., 2021; Vidra et al., 2022); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Also known as 3260C>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23328489, 21671020, 25637381, 12845657, 25948282, 26992456, 24323938, 22293751, 22711857, 28477318, 12442171, 17515904, 12967658, 19747923, 10923033, 29021639, 31422574, 31159747, 32613071, 31131967, 32123317, 33471991, 32377563, 9002670, 22193408, 30630528, 29884841, 35409996) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 24, 2023The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00014 (5/34502 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals and families affected with breast/ovarian cancer in the published literature (PMID: 12845657 (2003), 22711857 (2012), 25948282 (2015), 28477318 (2017), and 29021639 (2017), 32613071 (2020)). In a large breast cancer association study, the variant was found in individuals affected with breast cancer as well as unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/BRCA2). Experimental evidence regarding the effect of this variant on homologous recombination and DNA repair is conflicting (PMID: 21671020 (2011) and 23328489 (2013)). In addition, this variant was observed to impair binding to APRIN and RAD51 proteins, which requires further study (PMID: 22293751 (2012)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 11, 2016Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.3032C>G (p.Thr1011Arg) variant located in a BRCA2 repeat domain causes a missense change involving a conserved nucleotide with 4/4 in silico tools (SNPs&GO not captured here due to low reliability) predict a damaging outcome. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 3/120282 (1/40160), which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic BRCA2 variant of 1/1333. This variant has been reported in multiple affected individuals without strong evidence of causality. Three individuals (two cited by UMD and one cited by BIC) carrying this variant with co-occurrence of another BRCA1 pathogenic variant, suggesting against pathogenicity of our variant of interest. Functional studies showed inconsistent results, Balia_2011 showed that variant did not increase the spontaneous HR in the tested HelaG1 cell line (as WT) and concluded variant of interest as a likely benign variant. However, Spugnesi_2013 used yeast recombination assay to show that variant of interest did not induce HR (as pathogenic variant controls) and Brough_2012 showed variant fragment of BRCA2 protein with decreased interaction with both APRIN and RAD51 proteins detected via co-IP assay. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases cite the variant with conflicting classifications "uncertain significance" or "likely benign." Therefore, until additional information becomes available (ie, clinical and functional studies), the variant of interest has been classified as a "Variant of Uncertain Significance - Possibly Benign." -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2016- -
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 07, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 22, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.81
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.29
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.43
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.72
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.76
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.29
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.60
D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.78
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.5
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.72
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D
Vest4
0.64
MVP
0.97
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.75
D
GERP RS
5.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
gMVP
0.77

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358548; hg19: chr13-32911524; API