Menu
GeneBe

13-32338265-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.3910A>Gā€‹(p.Thr1304Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000312 in 1,411,972 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T1304I) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000031 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0750
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08286381).
BP6
Variant 13-32338265-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338265-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 37865.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Likely_benign=7, Benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3910A>G p.Thr1304Ala missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3910A>G p.Thr1304Ala missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000335
AC:
7
AN:
208654
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000176
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
113824
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000620
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000200
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000312
AC:
44
AN:
1411972
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0000286
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
699220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000367
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000687
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Alfa
AF:
0.0000278
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 12, 2018- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Feb 02, 2009- -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 08, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 20, 2023Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3910A>G (p.Thr1304Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.4e-05 (i.e., 7 heterozygotes) in 208654 control chromosomes (gnomAD v2.1, Exomes dataset). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.3910A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with pancreatic cancer and cutaneous malignant melanoma (e.g., Goldstein_2017, Dudley_2018), however without strong evidence for causality in both cases. The variant has also been reported in a healthy control (e.g., Momozawa_2018) as well as in 2 carriers in a healthy cohort of women over the age of 70 who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES database). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight submitters have reported clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with conflicting assessments (VUS, n = 2; Likely benign, n = 5; Benign, n = 1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 04, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 22, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDec 29, 2017- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Thr1304Ala variant was not identified in the literature in a patient population. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs28897723 as "With other allele"), ClinVar (1x as benign by SCRP; 3x as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, and Invitae; and 4x as uncertain significance by Counsyl, BI, CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, and at Sinai Health System), MutDB, LOVD 3.0 (2x), and UMD-LSDB (8x as unclassified variant). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 7 of 205258 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 4492 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002) and European in 6 of 95212 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006); it was not observed in the African, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Thr1304 residue is not conserved in mammals and 5 of 5 computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 5 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 15, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMGZ Medical Genetics CenterFeb 09, 2024ACMG codes applied following ENIGMA VCEP rules: BS1_SUP, BP1_STR -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 25, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.077
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.38
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
2.1
DANN
Benign
0.85
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.063
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.083
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.75
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.024
Sift
Benign
0.049
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.77
T;T
Vest4
0.11
MutPred
0.21
Loss of sheet (P = 0.0315);Loss of sheet (P = 0.0315);
MVP
0.79
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.035
T
GERP RS
-0.70
gMVP
0.065

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28897723; hg19: chr13-32912402; API