13-32338890-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.4535G>A​(p.Arg1512His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000124 in 1,613,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1512C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:4O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.371
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.068300635).
BP6
Variant 13-32338890-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338890-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51661.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, not_provided=1, Uncertain_significance=4}. Variant chr13-32338890-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4535G>A p.Arg1512His missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4535G>A p.Arg1512His missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152120
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000399
AC:
1
AN:
250334
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000738
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135588
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000130
AC:
19
AN:
1461662
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0000124
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
727120
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000144
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152120
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74324
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:4Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 29, 2024Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Absent from cases but present in controls in a breast cancer case-control study (PMID: 30287823); Also known as 4763G>A; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31131967, 34736091, 27149842, 25348012, 25266736, 32377563, 29884841, 30287823, 36243179) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMay 11, 2018- -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 29, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 30, 2023This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 15, 2018Variant summary: BRCA2 c.4535G>A (p.Arg1512His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.5e-06 in 267704 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publication). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.4535G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer (Chmielecki_2014, Giannakis_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA2 c.5576_5579delTTAA, p.I1859fsX3), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Arg1512His variant has been identified in individuals with breast and ovarian cancer; however no control chromosomes were included in these studies (Sanz 2010, Lindor 2011, Michal et al.). It is listed in the dbSNP database as coming from a “clinical source” (ID#:rs80358685) however no frequency information was provided. This residue is not highly conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. Other variants impacting the same amino acid position (p.Arg1512Cys (2X) and p.Arg1512Pro (1X)) have been presented in the BIC database as having unknown clinical significance. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. Therefore this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance (VUS). -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 12, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
0.54
DANN
Benign
0.23
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.052
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.034
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.068
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.19
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.050
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.074
Sift
Benign
0.55
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.55
T;T
Vest4
0.22
MutPred
0.29
Loss of catalytic residue at R1512 (P = 0.0751);Loss of catalytic residue at R1512 (P = 0.0751);
MVP
0.59
MPC
0.031
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
0.40
gMVP
0.15

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358685; hg19: chr13-32913027; COSMIC: COSV66459060; API