13-32340251-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5896C>T(p.His1966Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000459 in 1,613,906 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5896C>T | p.His1966Tyr | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5896C>T | p.His1966Tyr | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.5527C>T | p.His1843Tyr | missense_variant | 11/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.5896C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000120 AC: 3AN: 250972Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135816
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000486 AC: 71AN: 1461732Hom.: 0 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.0000440 AC XY: 32AN XY: 727170
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74332
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Feb 20, 2004 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Feb 11, 2010 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 01, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 10, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 05, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Nov 26, 2015 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 25, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 28, 2021 | The BRCA2 c.5896C>T; p.His1966Tyr variant (rs80358822) is reported in the literature in a large cohort of individuals with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer, but no specific phenotype data is available (Caux-Moncoutier 2011). This variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 38005), and is only observed on four alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database, indicating it is not a common polymorphism. The histidine at codon 1966 is weakly conserved, and computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.184). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.His1966Tyr variant is uncertain at this time. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Aug 04, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 28, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 02, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 30, 2024 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5896C>T (p.His1966Tyr) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 250972 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.5896C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer phenotypes without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Spearman_2008, Caux-Montcoutier_2011, Lu_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported in two internal samples (BRCA1 c.213-11T>G; BRIP1 c.2392C>T, p.Arg798X), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 18824701, 21120943, 25348012, 26689913). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 38005). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Inherited breast cancer and ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomics and Molecular Medicine Service, East Genomic Laboratory Hub, NHS Genomic Medicine Service | Jun 26, 2024 | BS3,BP1,BP4 - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.His1966Tyr variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358822) as With other allele, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Vantari Genetics, SCRP; classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, BIC), Clinvitae (conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity), MutDB, LOVD 3.0 (3X predicted neutral), UMD-LSDB (4X unclassified variant), BIC Database (5X with unknown clinical significance), ARUP Laboratories (uncertain significance), databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 3 of 277056 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000011 (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.His1966 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant is located with the Breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein functional domain increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at