13-32357815-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7691C>G(p.Thr2564Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,556 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T2564I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.7691C>G | p.Thr2564Ser | missense_variant | 16/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.7691C>G | p.Thr2564Ser | missense_variant | 16/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251304Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135812
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461556Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727106
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 21, 2023 | In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast/ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 31907386 (2020), 31837001 (2020), 30725392 (2019), 30287823 (2018), 27124784 (2016)), and in unaffected control individuals (PMIDs: 32467295 (2020), 33471991 (2021)). This variant has also been described to be located in a region of the BRCA2 gene that is tolerant to missense sequence changes (PMID: 31911673 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00016 (3/18392 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 28, 2023 | Observed in individuals with breast or ovarian cancer, and in unaffected controls (Park et al., 2016; So et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020; Dorling et al., 2021); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as 7919C>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12228710, 30725392, 29884841, 32467295, 32377563, 33471991, 31837001, 31907386, 32566972, 27124784) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 29, 2022 | The p.T2564S variant (also known as c.7691C>G), located in coding exon 15 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 7691. The threonine at codon 2564 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. This alteration was identified in two individuals from a cohort of 715 Korean breast cancer patients and classified as likely benign using ACMG's standards for variant classification based population data, computational data, functional data, clinical phenotype and segregation information (Park KS et al. Genet. Med., 2016 12;18:1250-1257). In a case control study, this variant was reported in 4/60,466 breast cancer cases and in 2/53,461 controls (Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439). The alteration has also been described in other individuals affected with breast or ovarian cancer (So MK et al. Breast Cancer, 2019 Jul;26:510-519, Kim HK et al. J Hum Genet, 2020 Mar;65:209-220), but also in unaffected controls (Dong H et al. J Med Genet, 2021 08;58:565-569). In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Sep 29, 2022 | This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 2564 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Thr2564Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs431825355, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 27124784). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 418684). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at